Social activist protested against school segregation in Chicago in 1966. In the case, Brown v. Board of Education, segregation in schools was found to be unconstitutional. The activist group marched to the mayor's residence where they soon began to act unruly. The protestors did not disperse when the police asked them to. The group soon afterwards was arrested and convicted.
The Supreme Court overturned the conviction of the Social Activist group in a unanimous decision for several reasons. The first was that petitioners were denied due process since there was no evidentiary support for their convictions. Second, the convictions were for demonstrating, not for refusing to obey police orders. Three, the trial judge charge allowed the jury to convict for acts protected by the First Amendment.
It was said that the arresting and charge of the activist group was a Hecklers veto. A hecklers veto occurs when an acting party's right, in this case Gregory v. Chicago, to freedom of speech is restricted by the government.
the third estate
Non, slaves had no rights. They were considered property. However, by modern standards, they had all their rights violated.
A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if
Ethnic cleansing involves the violation of all human rights and especially the right to life, liberty and property.
Pizza
The right to bare arms. No shirts, no shoes!
Because 9 million innocent people were killed
they had right, but they were just violated and not respected, i am not sure about the responsibilities
He who goes to bed with itchy butt, wakes up with sticky finger. -Confucius-
The colonists think the writs of assistance violated their rights because they wanted it to be secure in their home.
yes
Everyone did, this is why war is a very bad thing. The Nazi's violated peoples human rights a lot but so did the Americans when they killed innocent civilians in the firebombing of Dresden and when they dropped the Atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.