answersLogoWhite

0

Pornographic material inside a suitcase

User Avatar

Torrance Durgan

Lvl 10
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the illegally seized evidence in the mapp case?

Pornographic material inside a suitcase


The standard that illegally seized evidence cannot not be used at trial is known as the?

Mapp rule


Which famous court case established the principle that evidence gained through illegal methods could not be used in a state court case?

Mapp vs. Ohio


What is a map hearing?

A "Mapp" hearing is a pre-trial hearing on whether or not to suppress a piece of evidence that is going to be introduced at trial. The evidence could be tangible evidence, such as an illegal substance, or intangible evidence, such as a confession.


What was Dollree Mapp charged with in the Supreme Court case Mapp Ohio?

having obscene books


Which Supreme Court case established that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment may not be used in state law criminal prosecutions in state courts?

Mapp v. Ohio


What Amendment was violated in the Mapp v Ohio case?

Mapp violated the Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure Clause, which the Supreme Court had decided not to incorporate to the States in an earlier case, Wolf v. Colorado, 338 US 25 (1949).The decision in Mapp allowed the Court to apply the federal Exclusionary Rule to "evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Federal Constitution is inadmissible in a criminal trial in a state court."Interestingly, the case was originally presented to the Court as a First Amendment question because Mapp had been tried and convicted on obscenity charges, but the justices determined the real issue was the method police used to obtain the evidence used to convict Mapp at trial.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What were the results of Mapp v Ohio?

The primary result of Mapp v. Ohio, (1961) was that the US Supreme Court incorporated the Fourth Amendment to the States and applied the Exclusionary Rule originally established in Weeks v. US, (1914). The Exclusionary Rule prohibits the prosecution from using evidence obtained illegally (in this case, as the result of wrongful search and seizure) to convict the defendant.More InformationDollree Mapp won her US Supreme Court case, Mapp v. Ohio,(1961), by a vote of 6-3, and her conviction for possession of pornography was vacated, ending the seven-year prison sentence Ohio imposed in 1958.Although Mapp's attorney argued originally argued the Ohio law under which Mapp was convicted was unconstitutional because it was overbroad and infringed on her First Amendment rights, the Supreme Court ultimately decided the case on the basis of a Fourth Amendment search and seizure violation, incorporating that Amendment to the states and extending the federal "exclusionary rule" to prohibit illegally obtained evidence from being used against the defendant in court.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)


The Supreme Court case of Mapp v Ohio established the?

exclusionary rule


When did the Supreme Court hear and decide the Mapp vs Ohio case?

nice


What states that evidence obtained in an illegal search may not be introduced at trial?

The Exclusionary Rule.Illegally obtained evidence will be excluded from the trial.Although there were cases regarding this issue beforehand, it became "rule" under Mapp v. Ohio.


Famous supreme court case dealing with probable cause?

Mapp vs. Ohio