The Mapp v. Ohio case, decided in 1961, was significant because it established the exclusionary rule at the state level, which prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. This ruling extended the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures to state courts, reinforcing the principle that evidence obtained in violation of a defendant's rights cannot be used against them. The case underscored the importance of safeguarding individual rights and maintaining judicial integrity, shaping the landscape of American criminal procedure.
having obscene books
Pornographic material inside a suitcase
exclusionary rule
nice
Pornographic material inside a suitcase
Mapp vs. Ohio
Loose constuction.
having obscene books
Land mark criminal procedure case involving appeals to the Supreme court
I studied the case and never found an opinion by JFK.
i like dog food in my cereal
There are no other 'related' cases. The US Supreme Court only takes one representative case for review when considering the constitutionality of a law. If, indeed, there even were other cases, ONLY the Mapp v. Ohio case was chosen.