During the "discovery" portion of the trial procedure.
Yes.
It can be. It is up to the prosecutor or the defense lawyer. They need to be notarized.
Generally speaking - yes - you do have the right to see it or refer to it (or a copy of it). You do not have the right to have it back.
Yes, but the judge may direct the lawyer to stop and let the witness finish. If you are on cross examination, the lawyer that represents you or called you as a witness will probably jump up and ask the judge to direct the lawyer to let you finish, unless you are rambling or need to be interrupted.
What witness statement, in what case?
No, you do not need a lawyer to serve as a witness in your case. Any individual who has relevant information or evidence can serve as a witness, regardless of whether they are a lawyer or not.
In a trial:a lawyer presents a witness to give directtestimony.The opposing lawyer then cross examines the witness (to minimize the effect of the witness).The original lawyer can redirect (possibly to reaffirm the witnesses original testimony.The opposing lawyer may try to recross the witness again.
No, a lawyer cannot be a witness for his client in a legal proceeding due to the conflict of interest it presents.
Yes, a witness can have a lawyer present during their testimony to provide legal advice and support.
Yes, a lawyer can serve as a witness in a legal proceeding, but there are limitations and ethical considerations that may apply.
A witness does not typically need a lawyer when testifying in court. Witnesses are usually called to provide their testimony and answer questions truthfully. However, in certain circumstances, a witness may choose to consult with a lawyer for guidance or representation.
A lawyer.