The bail bondsman's right to arrest has been long established by a court decision in which it stated that the bondsman or bounty hunter could do any of the following: seize the fugitive and deliver him/her up in their discharge; pursue the fugitive to another state; arrest the fugitive on the Sabbath and could break into the house for that purpose.
This practice derives from old longstanding common law and gives bailbondsmen a unique power and authority not even available to law enforcement authorities.
See below link;
The defendant is under the order of the court. House arrest is a PRIVILEGE. If he is on house arrest and this information is communicated to law enforcement (which it probably has) if he leaves the property to which he is confined he can be arrested on sight.
The person who hired the balilbondsman and paid the balibondsman's fee will lose the fee they paid. It is now the bailbondsman's responsibility to return the defendant to court or he will lose the ENTIRE amount of the bond they posted.
The use of the word "defendant" implies that the individual is already under arrest and has been charged. In that case: They have the right to counsel, to be confronted by the witnesses against them, and to be tried by a jury of their peers. If convicted, they have the right to expect NO cruel or unusual punishment.
Any time after arrest (or in custody by an LEO) and before questioning.
If a bailbondsman bonds out a defendant and then the defendant flees - the bailbondsman will lose more than the 'deposit' that was paid to him for his services - he will lose the ENTIRE amount of the defendants bond amount - which in many cases will amount to many thousands of dollars that he willhave to pay to the court.THAT is why bailbondsman employ bail agents to recapture and return fleeing defendants. Many times they are more successful than law enforcement in this endeavor, AND they do not necessarily have to ovserve all the legal "niceties" that law enforcement must.My adivce: Don't skip on a bailbond!!
A Warrant of Arrest usually works.
Within 24 to 72 hours af arrest.
The process by which a defendant is returned to the State of Arizona to stand trial after arrest in another jurisdiction.
If this happens then a warrant is put on their arrest
When a Defendant fails to appear for court on a plea or trial date. The judge can issue an orderconditionallyforfeiting the bond and issuing a capias warrant for the Defendant's arrest.
In all probablity the judge will issue a warrant for his/her arrest.
The suspect becomes the defendant during the arraignment, which is the initial court appearance following arrest. During this stage, the defendant is formally charged and enters a plea. The prosecution may also present preliminary evidence to establish probable cause for the charges, which is essential for moving the case forward.