Gideon V. Wainwright (A+, Civics)
Individuals who cannot afford an attorney have the constitutional right to be provided with legal representation at no cost in criminal cases, as established by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This right ensures that everyone has a fair trial and access to legal counsel, even if they cannot afford to hire a lawyer.
From what I understand of the american legal system - everyone has the right to be represented by an attorney - regardless of whether or not they can actually afford to hire one. It's the same here in the UK - there is a legal-aid system which pays lawyers to defend clients that cannot afford to hire their own legal professional.
In the United States, the court is required to appoint an attorney to represent a defendant who cannot afford one in a felony case, regardless of whether it is the defendant's first offense. This right to counsel is protected by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Only if you cannot afford an attorney for your driving-under-the-influence case, will an attorney be provided for you by the court if it is a criminal case.
Persons charged with a criminal offense are entitled to representation regardless of their financial situation. That is the job of court appointed PDA's or Guardian Ad Litems for those persons who cannot afford private counsel. The ability to afford private representation is usually determined by the presiding judge. Persons involved in civil matters such as creditor lawsuits, personal injury and so forth are not entitled to such representation unless they can obtain a pro bono attorney or qualify for legal aid assistance.
Because he couldnt afford an attorney to represent him in criminal court. The US Supreme Court ruled that criminal defendants will be provided with a defense attorney at government cost when the defendant cannot afford an attorney.
The role of a defense attorney is the lawyer representing the person accused of committing a crime. In the United States, if a defendant cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed.
The court will not revoke bond based simply on the fact that you are having difficulty retaining an attorney. So..., there is something else going on that caused the bond revocation that the questioner is not disclosing. If you cannot afford an attorney why don't you qualify for a PD? Simply saying that you can't afford an attorney does not automatically qualify you for a public defender. Income level is usually the guiding factor in appointing a PD.
Criminal - court through legal aid will appoint one for you.
Right to remain silent Right to be represented by Attorney Right to have an attorney appointed to you if you cannot afford one. NOTE: In other countries, you may have no rights.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you at interrogation time and at court.
Such a right has never existed. You have a right to a public defender; however, there is no guarantee that the public defender is "at no cost to you". If you cannot afford one, the public will provide you with an attorney. However, if the court believes you can afford an attorney, you are expected to pay for, and provide, your own.