answersLogoWhite

0

re-word your question. it makes no sense and I cannot understand it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Supreme Court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?

How important is the original intent of the Constitution when deciding cases? -Apex


What has caused new interpretations of the constitution?

Laws passed by Congress and judicial decisions are two things that have caused new interpretations of the Constitution. A changing and evolving society is another cause.


What is judicial restraint in deciding case?

Judicial restraint is sometimes regarded as the opposite of judicial activism. In deciding questions of constitutional law, judicially restrained jurists go to great lengths to defer to the legislature.


Supreme Court justice who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?

A : To what extent should the supreme court work to promote social progress ?


Which of three branch is responsible for deciding what law mean?

Judicial Branch


This type of judicial philosophy called?

Strict constructionism is a judicial philosophy that interprets the Constitution based on its original intent and text, strictly adhering to the literal meaning of the words within it. Judges following this philosophy typically do not incorporate contemporary values or societal changes in their interpretations.


Witch article of the constitution address the judicial branch of the government?

Which artical of the constitution adresses the judicial branch of goverment


What has the author John Agresto written?

John Agresto has written: 'The Supreme Court and constitutional democracy' -- subject(s): Judicial power, Judicial review, Separation of powers, United States, United States. Supreme Court 'Liberty and Equality Under the Constitution'


How did judicial interpretation allow flexibility in the Constitution?

Judicial interpretation allows flexibility in the Constitution by enabling courts to interpret its provisions in light of contemporary values, societal changes, and evolving norms. This principle, often seen in landmark Supreme Court decisions, allows judges to apply constitutional principles to new circumstances that the framers could not have anticipated. As a result, judicial interpretations can adapt the Constitution to modern issues, ensuring its relevance over time. This dynamic process helps maintain the Constitution as a living document, capable of addressing the needs of each generation.


What is the judicial view and how does it change the constitution?

The members of the judicial service comision


What branch of government controls how court orders are enforced?

The Judicial Branch of government is in charge of interpreting the Constitution, reviewing laws, and deciding cases involved in state matters. There is not a branch that specifically controls how court orders are enforced, but the Judicial Branch is involved in the Judiciary, law-making, system.


What has the author K K Mathew written?

K. K. Mathew has written: 'The right to equality and property under the Indian constitution' -- subject(s): Equality before the law, Right of property 'Three lectures' -- subject(s): India, India. Supreme Court, Judicial process, Natural law, Political questions and judicial power, Resistance to Government