0
What else can I help you with?
What are the componets of an argument?
There are particular components every sound argument must contain. The basic components are to state the claim, the grounds, qualifier, warrant, backing, and the rebuttal.
What gives an argument warrant?
Supporting evidence
What does an argument have to have in order to have warrant?
Supporting evidence
What does an argument need to have to have warrant in a debate?
supporting evidence
What does an argument need in order to have warrant in a debate?
supporting evidence
What is Toulmin's model for good argument?
Contention + evidence = warrant. -Apex.
What is a toulmins model for a good argument?
Contention + evidence = warrant. -Apex.
What are the toulmin's model two parts of a good argument?
Contention + evidence = warrant
What must a search warrant state?
An arrest warrant must name or specifically describe the person(s) to be arrested.
Who approves search warrants and what must be listed on the warrant?
A search warrant must be approved by a judge or magistrate in order for it to be executed. The warrant must specify what is being searched for and the physical address of where the search will take place.
What is Toulmin's model for a good argument?
Toulmin's model for a good argument consists of six components: claim, data, warrant, backing, rebuttal, and qualifier. The claim is the main statement being argued, supported by data or evidence. The warrant is the reasoning that connects the data to the claim, while the backing provides additional support. The rebuttal addresses counterarguments, and the qualifier acknowledges the limitations or uncertainties of the argument.
What does a debate need to have warrant?
A debate needs to have a warrant to provide logical justification for claims made during the discussion. The warrant connects evidence to the argument, explaining why the evidence supports the claim. It helps establish the credibility of the argument by linking it to established facts, principles, or reasoning, thereby enhancing its persuasiveness. Without a warrant, arguments may appear weak or unsupported, undermining the overall effectiveness of the debate.
