Yes, if your spouse had your permission to open the account.
No. Respondeat Superior is a legal doctrine that allows a business to be held responsible for the actions of the employee. But the employee is still liable. Example: I'm driving and get into a car crash with a Pepsi truck. If the truck driver caused the accident, he could be held liable to pay for my vehicle or medical expenses. However, if he was delivering Pepsi on the job, Pepsi may also be held liable. Both the driver and the company would be jointly liable.
procedural defenses are a form of defense, in which a party argues that it should not be held liable for a legal charge or claim brought against it.
In the jurisdiction of New south Wales, a child under the age of 10 years of age can NOT be held criminally liable for their actions. a child BETWEEN 10 & 14 years of age MAY be held criminally liable if the prosecution can prove that they knew what they were doing was criminal rather than naughty (this is referred to as doli incapax). A child over 14 years CAN be held criminally liable. These ages are in the eyes of the law able to separate those who have intent to commit the offence from those who do have the intent. For Your Information: Intent to commit the crime is the Mens Rea element of the offence.
You can be taken to court and be held liable for the goods you acquired. You will then have to pay for the items, plus court fees and a possible fine.
Call the number on your summons, or if you've lost that, look in the blue section of your White Pages for Jury Administration.
Under Florida law a spouse cannot be held liable for debt repayment if the debt was not jointly incurred. The issue concerning the second card holder will need to be taken up with the creditor. If the couple were still legally married at the time, the creditor will probably accept the spouse's right to use the account. In which case the account holder will be held liable for all charges pertaining to the account in question.
If ex-wife owes half of IRS and now files for bankruptcy, spouse may be liable to pay his portion if the debt was is a joint account. Otherwise, spouse will not be held liable for any portion thereof.
I had a baby by a married man he's already in child support court he's in the arrears and he has no job but his wife works in the state of PA I would like to know would she be held liable for payment of his child
It depends: a. No - If the spouse writes a check out of a single account held by the person writing the check b. Yes - If the spouse writes a check out of a single account that is held by their spouse and the person writing the check is not a joint owner of the account. To be simple: Writing a check from an account that is not held by the person writing the check is a crime.
As long as your daughter is under 18 or 22 in som cases you can be held liable for any of her actions
YES. Oregon is an equitable distribution state. Typically a spouse can be held liable for the medical bills of the other spouse under the doctrine of necessaries. This doctrine hold that a spouse is liable for the necessaries of the other spouse. Necessaries are items that are essential such as food, shelter and medical bills.
Normally the spouse is held liable for the debt. The presumption is that they benefited by the goods and services.
You should contact an attorney in New Jersey to get an exact answer..However, normally if you have not signed the credit card contract, or any contract, you will not be held liable to the debts of a deceased spouse..Remember..A creditor can go after the estate of a deceased spouse. * No, New Jersey is not a community property state, therefore marital debts that are not jointly held belong solely to the spouse who held the account. All non exempt assets and debts of the deceased are entered into probate procedure and handled according to the state probate laws.
If she opens an account with her first and your last name, you would not be liable. If she opens an account with your first and last name, you may be liable, especially if she uses your SS#. If you have reason to believe this has happened, contact the bank and report the fraud.
In Arkansas the estate will be responsible. The spouse indirectly will pay, as they cannot inherit until they are resolved.
If the spouse inherited the estate, the spouse will pay the IRS debt. Since the two were still married, the taxes must be paid by the remaining spouse.If they were separated at the end of 2007 I assume that they did not file a joint return for the 2007 taxes. If this is the case, the husband's estate must pay the taxes. If the estate cannot pay the taxes in full, then the spouse will not be held liable for anything that is still owed. A distinction must be made between the spouse being liable and the estate being liable.The only way that the spouse is fully liable is if the return was a joint return.
Liability is limited to the account and the cash in it. if there is any forgery or crime committed by the co-account holder, the other person cannot be held liable (Provided you have proof that you did not indulge in criminal activity) If the co-holder has lots of debt then the debtor can confiscate the cash in the joint account.