Yes. The child must be 18 years or older.
In California, a child can legally leave home at the age of 18 without the parent getting in trouble. If a child leaves home before that age without parental consent, it could be considered a status offense, but parents would not typically face legal repercussions unless neglect or abuse is involved.
No, in Texas, a custodial parent cannot force their 16-year-old child to leave the home. Parents have a legal obligation to provide for the care and support of their minor children until they reach the age of majority. A parent who fails to do so may be subject to legal consequences.
Yes, in California, parents have the legal authority to make their runaway child come home. They can involve the police to help locate and return the child, and the police will assist in the process due to the child's status as a minor.
In Texas, parents are legally responsible for their children until they turn 18, regardless of whether the child has moved out of the home. This means that parents are still responsible for their minor child's welfare until they reach the age of majority.
Probably not, but she may turn the child over to child services if the child is unmanageable. Most parents would choose to keep their children close and at home. However, that does not mean that the parent has to go above and beyond when the child is abusive, involved in illegal activities--generally when being in the home is doing no one any good. It stands to reason that both parties have to take the responsibility to make home life work--most teenagers know what they have to do. I do not feel that the child is automatically entitled to be provided for if they cannot cope or manage the system. Even kids who must leave for safety need to do so on their own.
That parent would be in violation of a court order, so yes, they would be in trouble. The adult makes the decisions, not the child. The child should be put into a car and driven home.
A parent technically can kick you out of the home in Nebraska at age 18. This is because you are technically an adult.
The parent. In most states, the parent is responsible for the child until the child officialy becomes an adult.
I assume this is a case of the child being with the non-custodial parent and not wanting to go back to the custodial's parent when visitation is over? IF so, and if you're in the US...absolutely you can get in trouble for that.
In California, a child can legally leave home at the age of 18 without the parent getting in trouble. If a child leaves home before that age without parental consent, it could be considered a status offense, but parents would not typically face legal repercussions unless neglect or abuse is involved.
Not on taxes no. The parent the child lives with has the main right to claim the child. But if that parent can't or doesn't want to then the other parent can
no . if the parent have trust , then it shouldn't be a problem.!
If DHR ( department of human resources) get into this situation they will tell you that every child need to have their own bed and dresser. If they end up looking into the situation and you do not have these they will pull the child from the home and place them in a more suitable home weather it be the other parent, foster care, etc.
No. If you have your parent's permission, then you can live with who you want.
no is not you dumboos
If a Parent so chooses to home-school their child, there is no law against it so long as there is a basic curriculum the child can follow, and the the parent registers their home-schooled child with their respective state. It is ultimately the Parent's decision whether or not to place their child in public, private or home school. It merely depends on what the parent feels would be a more productive learning environment for their child.
i think the parent has to let a child live at home until they are 18 unless they both agree the child can move out