To find the docket number for a legal case, you can typically search for it on the court's website, contact the court clerk's office, or look for it on any legal documents related to the case.
Dockets for Orange County Superior Court can be found on several sites that provide this information. The website, OC Court, is the most reliable, as it has direct information on courts within Orange County.
This is a New York Case that has to do with Workman's Comp in the State of New York. It involves New York Law. If you live in the State of New York, there are a number of Public Law Libraries open to the general public that would have this case available. You can call your government for information or your public library. It should not be difficult if you have bus fare.
A "brief" is a paper filed with the court for the court's use (usually in a case under consideration). Accordingly - the following of definition of legal "merit" will be self-explanatory. "Merit is a term subject to various meanings, but in the legal context, merit refers to a claim which has a valid basis, setting forth sufficient facts from which the court could find a valid claim of deprivation of a legal right. Meritorious claims usually cite legal authorities, such as statutory laws or case law, to support their arguments. However, merit is a subjective term that takes various factors into account on a case-by-case basis. For example, a pro se defendant seeking post-conviction relief is often be expected to construct legal arguments, cite legal authority, or draft her petition as artfully as a lawyer would. If the evidence defeats the claim, the claim is "meritless."
You can typically find templates or examples of a motion to suppress statements for a case like Jackson v. Denno by searching online legal databases, law libraries, or consulting with a legal professional for guidance. Make sure to tailor the motion to the specific facts and circumstances of the case to ensure it is relevant and effective.
If you need to find information on marketing for attorney's there are a number of companies with information or services available. These include Lawyers Group Marketing, IM Solutions, Convert IT, Legal Marketing and Total Attorneys.
The most common form of a demand draft is a check. Checks have account numbers, not docket numbers. Other demand drafts may or may not have account numbers, but not docket numbers, unless there is a legal action that ordered the demand instrument.
It SOUNDS as if this might be the docket number of a particular case within the CA court system. You would porobably have to go to the Clerk Of The Courts office to find out more specifics.
You have not filed a bankruptcy. You get a docket number immediately when you file. So, yes, they can repo your car. If this was done by a lawyer, you should find out what the lawyer actually did. You can confirm your bankruptcy filing online or by telephoning the court in which it was supposedly filed, and get the docket number. It's a public record.
Take the docket number to the county recorders office and get a copy of the judgment. The information on the judgment will give you the name of the lender.
Dockets for Orange County Superior Court can be found on several sites that provide this information. The website, OC Court, is the most reliable, as it has direct information on courts within Orange County.
take it to court Answer You find a lawyer to represent you and he or she files the case.
Check the Texas statutes and case law.
On the modern Rolex Oyster case, the serial number is located between the lugs (where the band attaches to the case). On one end, you'll find the case reference number. On the other end, you'll find the serial number.
The person who needs the information will have to search the state's circuit court archives of the county where the ruling was made. If the docket and case number are not available then the names of the petitioner and respondent can be used. Unfortunately many state court records are not online for older cases and even those that are, it is very difficult to find accurate records without having all the information pertaining to the case, (names, docket and case numbers, dates, etc.). A person involved in any litigation should keep permanently every document that relates to the matter in a secure and accessible place.
No, you cannot obtain a CUSIP number using your court case number. CUSIP numbers are unique identifiers for securities, such as stocks and bonds, used in financial markets, while court case numbers relate to legal proceedings. To find a CUSIP number, you typically need details about the specific security, such as the issuer's name or the type of security.
On the modern Rolex Oyster case, the serial number is located between the lugs (where the band attaches to the case). On one end, you'll find the case reference number. On the other end, you'll find the serial number.
The Supreme Court of the United States hosts its own web site that maintains the docket, calendar, merits briefs, slip opinions and other information about cases being heard in the current Term.The following cases are currently scheduled for the Supreme Court's 2009 Term. There may be additions or changes to the list in the future. You can read the merit briefs for each case at the SCOTUS website (see Related Links, below).US Supreme Court Docket 2009 Term(Retrieved March 26, 2010)Abbott v. Abbott, Docket No. 08-645Alabama v. North Carolina, Docket No. 132 Orig.Alvarez v. Smith, Docket No. 08-351American Needle v. National Football League, Docket No. 08-661Arave v. Hoffman, Docket No. 07-110Astrue, Comm'r of Social Security v. Ratliff, Docket No. 08-1322Barber v. Thomas, Warden, Docket No. 09-5201Beard, Sec. of PA DOC v. Kindler, Docket No. 08-992Berghuis, Warden, v. Smith, Docket No. 08-1402Berghuis, Warden, v. Thompkins, Docket No. 08-1470Bilski v. Kappos, Docket No. 08-964Black v. United States, Docket No. 08-876Bloate v. United States, Docket No. 08-728Brisoce v. Virginia, Docket No. 07-11191Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, Att'y Gen., Docket No. 09-60Carr v.United States, Docket No. 08-1301Christian Legal Society Chapter v. Martinez, Docket No. 08-1371Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Docket No. 08-205City of Ontario, CA v. Quon, Docket No. 08-1332Conkright v. Frommert, Docket No. 08-810Doe #1 v. Reed, WA Sec. of State, Docket No. 09-559Dolan v. United States, Docket No. 09-367Dillon v. United States, Docket No. 09-6338Florida v. Powell, Docket No. 08-1175Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Bd., Docket No. 08-861Graham v. Florida, Docket No. 08-7412 and Sullivan v. Florida, Docket No. 08-7621 (consolidated)Graham County Soil v. United States, Docket No. 08-304Granite Rock Company v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Docket No. 08-1214Hamilton v. Lanning, Docket No. 08-998Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Ins., Docket No. 09-448Hemi Group, LLC v. City of New York, NY, Docket No. 08-969Health Care Service v. Pollitt, Docket No. 09-38Hertz Corporation v. Friend, Docket No. 08-1107Holder, Att'y Gen., v. Humanitarian Law Project, Docket No. 08-1498 and Humanitarian Law Project v. Holder, Att'y Gen., Docket No. 09-89Holland v. Florida, Docket No. 09-5327Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Docket No. 07-480Hui v. Castaneda, Docket No. 08-1529Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Docket No. 08-1200Johnson v. United States, Docket No. 08-6925Jones v. Harris Associates, Docket No. 08-586Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha v. Regal-Beliot Corp., Docket No. 08-1553 and Union Pacific Railroad Co., v. Regal-Beliot Corp., Docket No. 08-1554Kiyemba v. Obama, Docket No. 08-1234Krupski v. Costa Crociere, Docket No. 09-337Kucana v. Holder, Attny Gen., Docket No. 08-911Levin v. Commerce Energy, Inc., Docket No. 09-223Lewis v. City of Chicago, IL, Docket No. 08-974Mac's Shell Service v. Shell Oil Products, Docket No. 08-240 and Shell Oil Products v. Mac's Shell Service, Docket No. 08-372 (consolidated)Magwood v. Culliver, Docket No. 09-158Maryland v. Shatzer, Docket No. 08-680McDonald v. City of Chicago, IL, Docket No. 08-1521McDaniel v. Brown, Docket No. 08-559Merck & Co., Inc., v. Reynolds, Docket No. 08-905Milavetz v. United States, Docket No. 08-1119 and United States v. Milavetz, Docket No. 08-1225 (consolidated)Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, Docket No. 09-475Morrison v. National Australia Bank LTD, Docket No. 08-1191New Process Steel v. NLRB, Docket No. 08-1457NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities, Docket No. 08-674Padilla v. Kentucky, Docket No. 08-651Perdue, Gov. of GA v. Kenny A., Docket No. 08-970Pottawattamie County, IA v. McGhee, Docket No. 08-1065Reed Elsevier, Inc., v. Muchnick, Docket No. 08-103Renico, Warden v. Lett, Docket No. 09-338Rent-A-Center, West v. Jackson, Docket No. 09-497Robertson v. United States, Ex Rel. Watson, Docket No. 08-6261Salazar, Sec. of Interior v. Buono, Docket No. 08-472Samantar v. Yousuf, Docket No. 08-1555Schwab v. Reilly, Docket No. 08-538Shady Grove Orthopedic Assoc., v. Allstate Insurance, Docket No. 08-1008Skilling v. United States, Docket No. 08-1394Smith, Warden v. Spisak, Docket No. 08-724South Carolina v. North Carolina, Docket No. 138, OriginalStolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeeds International, Docket No. 08-1198Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Dept. of Enviromental Protection, Docket No. 08-1151Union Pacific Railroad Co., v. Brotherhood of Locomotive, Docket No. 08-604United States v. Comstock, Docket No. 08-1224United States v. Marcus, Docket No. 08-1341United States v. O'Brien, Docket No. 08-1569United States v. Stevens, Docket No. 08-769United Student Aid Funds v. Espinosa, Docket No. 08-1134Weyhrauch v. United States, Docket No. 08-1196Wood v. Allen, Comm'r, AL DOC Docket No. 08-9156For more information, see Related Links and Related Questions, below.