0
Do you mean rationale? If so, obiter dictum is, by definition, not part of the rationale for deciding a case. It is extra language inserted by the judge that is not necessary in deciding the case.
For example, in Dred Scott v. Sandford, Chief Justice Taney writes in the opinion that African-Americans are not and cannot be citizens, thus Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in federal courts. Chief Justice Taney should have stopped after that, because if Dred Scott didn't have a right to sue in federal courts, then the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction and the case should be dismissed. However, Taney goes on to say that slavery can't be banned in any state or territory because it's a violation of the due process clause. This is all obiter dictum, it has no relevance on the decision of the issue presented before the Court.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Obiter dictum can become part of the ratio by being adopted or relied upon by future courts in their reasoning to reach a decision. If the statement in the obiter dictum is considered persuasive and relevant to the legal issue at hand, it may influence the development of legal principles and become part of the ratio of a later case.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the concepts of ratio decidendi and obiter dicta?
Ratio decidendi refers to the legal reasoning behind a court's decision that forms the binding precedent in future cases. Obiter dicta are statements or opinions made by the court that are not essential to the decision and do not create binding precedent, but may provide guidance or insight on the case.
Meaning of the ratio of the case?
The ratio of the case typically refers to comparing one amount or value to another, often expressed as a fraction. It helps in analyzing relationships between different data sets and can provide insights into trends or patterns. For example, in finance, a common ratio is the debt-to-equity ratio, which compares a company's debt to its equity.
What are the words said in passing in a court case in UK?
Words said in passing in a court case in the UK refer to comments made by the judge or legal professionals (such as barristers or solicitors) that are not central to the main legal arguments being presented. These remarks are not binding as legal precedent but may provide insight into the judge's thinking or help clarify certain points.
What is a judge's ruling or statement?
A judge's ruling is the final decision issued by a judge in a legal case. It determines the outcome of the case and often includes the judge's reasoning behind the decision. A judge's statement is any formal declaration made by a judge during court proceedings, which can range from clarifying legal principles to providing instructions to the parties involved.
If you have been a bully in the past and had been spoken to by the police can you still become a lawyer?
Yes, it is possible to become a lawyer even if you have engaged in bullying behavior in the past and have interacted with the police. However, it is important to address and take responsibility for your past actions, show remorse, and demonstrate personal growth and maturity. Each situation is considered on a case-by-case basis, so it is advisable to consult with the appropriate authorities or legal institutions for guidance in such circumstances.
What does obiter dictum means?
Obiter dictum refers to remarks made by a judge in a legal opinion that are not essential to the decision of the case. These comments are considered persuasive but not binding precedent.
Can obiter dicta be rescinded by the same judge who made it?
I think you may be confusing the meaning of the term. The word obiter dicta is a Latin word which means "things said by the way." Obiter dicta can be passing comments, opinions or examples provided by a judge. Statements constituting 'obiter dicta' are not binding. [For example, if a court dismisses a case due to lack of jurisdiction and offers opinions on the merits of a case, then these opinions constitute 'obiter dicta.'] Obiter dictum (plural of obiter dicta) is an opinion or a remark made by a judge which does not form a part of the court's decision. Therefore, obiter dictum are not legally binding and can ONLY be rescinded, or withdrawn, by the judge who made them.
What is obiter dictum?
# Law. An opinion voiced by a judge that has only incidental bearing on the case in question and is therefore not binding. Also called dictum. # An incidental remark or observation; a passing comment.
What is the legal term for an opinion unnecessary for the decision of a case?
"Obiter dictum" or simply "dictum" or "dicta" is the term used to describe statements made by a court in its opinion that are unnecessary to decide the case. When such an unnecessary statement is used to negate a party's attorney's position, that attorney will refer to it as "merely obiter dictum (or "mere dicta") which does not bind this court." When used in support of the case, it is called "supporting rationale for the court's ultimate decision deserving of great weight for its wisdom."
What is a decision in a case that sets forth a new legal principle establishing a precedent?
Ratio decidendi sets forth the legal reasoning for the decision in a case. (Obiter dictum is a judicial opinion or incidental comment that is not legally binding.)
What are the words said in passing in a court case in UK?
Words said in passing in a court case in the UK refer to comments made by the judge or legal professionals (such as barristers or solicitors) that are not central to the main legal arguments being presented. These remarks are not binding as legal precedent but may provide insight into the judge's thinking or help clarify certain points.
Which courts does the obiter dictum of a US Supreme Court decision bind?
None. Ratio decidendi sets forth the legal reasoning for the decision in a case. Obiter dictumis judicial opinion or incidental comments that are relevant, but not legally binding, because they're not part of the decision.The ratio decidendi creates binding precedent on all federal courts and on state courts of general jurisdiction, provided the decision involves a constitutional issue that is incorporated to the states, or becomes incorporated to the states as a result of that decision.For example, the US Supreme Court's decision in McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. ___ (2010) applied the Second Amendment to the States via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.
Can a judge give his own opinion in judgment?
Yes. Many judgments are a matter of opinion (or interpretation) that must be based on -- and supported by -- the rule of law.A judge can also express his or her personal opinion (beliefs) that may be relevant to the case, but not part of the official decision. This is called "obiter dictum," or "dictum" for short. Many cases include dicta (plural), which sometimes confuses readers as to which part of the opinion is the legal decision and which part is an aside.If you're asking whether a judgment can be entirely based on personal belief without a legal basis, then no.
What is dictum?
# Law. An opinion voiced by a judge that has only incidental bearing on the case in question and is therefore not binding. Also called dictum. # An incidental remark or observation; a passing comment.
Meaning of the ratio of the case?
The ratio of the case typically refers to comparing one amount or value to another, often expressed as a fraction. It helps in analyzing relationships between different data sets and can provide insights into trends or patterns. For example, in finance, a common ratio is the debt-to-equity ratio, which compares a company's debt to its equity.
What is the difference between holding and dictum?
The "holding" of a case states the "rule of the case", meaning it has been decided ("held") to favor one side or the other because of the rule. A "dictum" refers to just about anything else mentioned in the opinion of the court that made the ruling, but does not establish the rule itself.
What is the ratio of a case?
The ratio of a single case is 1.
