what happens when social services withholds evidence? and falsifies that evidence?
it is serious but appears that this happens day in day out
I am not a solicitor but if i was you Google fraud Act 2006
Fraud by False Representation (Section 2),
Fraud by failure to disclose information (section 3)
Fraud by abuse of position (section 4)
also google misfeasance in public office and misconduct in public office
Ministry of Justice have said its an offence under the perjury act 1911
When the Police charge a suspect, they require evidence. Without evidence, there is no hope for a conviction at trial. A witness statement is one form of evidence. Clearly having more evidence like video or DNA etc...would strengthen any case. The credibility of the witness, detail o the statement, and number of witnesses all play a factor, but the simple answer is yes, charges can be laid. That doesn't necessarily mean a conviction will be rendered
Yes, witness testimony can be accepted as evidence, even if it was not marked as an exhibit. The credibility and relevance of the testimony will be evaluated by the court based on various factors such as witness demeanor, consistency, and corroborating evidence. It is ultimately up to the judge to determine the weight and value of the testimony in the case.
The two common types of evidence in a civil suit are testimonial evidence, which includes witness testimony, and documentary evidence, which consists of written records, photographs, emails, contracts, or any other physical evidence that can be presented in court.
Yes, "witness" is a noun. It refers to a person who has seen an event take place or has evidence of something.
Sources of circumstantial evidence can include witness testimony, physical evidence such as fingerprints or DNA, behavior of the accused before or after the incident, and any other indirect evidence that implies a connection to the crime. Circumstantial evidence is not based on direct observation but on inference, making it important to consider in the context of the overall case.
Examples of tampering with evidence include altering or destroying physical evidence, planting false evidence, fabricating documents or witness statements, and withholding or concealing evidence that could be crucial to a case.
If the witness is testifying that HE heard the gunshots - it is called "direct evidence.' It is also a type called "testimonial" evidence as opposed to "demonstative" evidence. The testimonial evidence is that the witness testifies verbally that he heard the gun. The gun itself if entered into evidence would be demonstrative evidence.
Testimonial evidence is evidence given by a witness of things they've experienced first-hand. The first-hand account of a witness is called their testimony.
A witness can bring in character evidence of their good character when their character is relevant to the case, such as when their credibility is being challenged. This type of evidence can be used to show the witness's reputation for honesty or truthfulness.
Oral testimony given in a court by a witness. Also called parol evidence.
It is your choice, but if you have material information that would aid either the prosecution OR the defense, and choose to withhold it, you may be treated as a "hostile witness" or, even held in contempt of court for withholding evidence.
The case would have to rely on physical evidence (if any), and/or witness statements.
The evidence presented in court, such as witness testimony, documents, and physical evidence, supports the claim being made by the party.
By "real evidence" I assume you mean evidence given by a witness verbally under oath on the witness stand. That is called testimonial evidence. In any event there are two types of evidence. One is testimonial evidence and one is demonstrative evidence. Testimonial evidence is simply evidence given by a person testifying verbally under oath or affirmation. Demonstrative evidence is taken from inanimate objects that demonstrate some particular fact. In a typical Law and Order episode the witness who testifies he saw the defendant shoot the victim is providing testimonial evidence. Exhibit A, the murder weapon with the defendant's fingerprints on it is demonstrative evidence, because it demonstrates that the defendant had the weapon in his hand. Both are real evidence as the defendant will shortly be very unhappy to learn.
Witness
Yes. If there is compelling evidence, even in the absence of a witness, you can be convicted of a crime. Also, if there is a proven motive in addition to the evidence, that will add to the probabibility of a conviction.
Weak evidence in a criminal investigation could be a single unreliable witness testimony without any corroborating evidence, such as physical evidence or surveillance footage.