answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

protection against double jeopardy

I do not think this is a protection again Double Jeopardy as this is a person not being able to be tried for the same crime twice.

It is the right to a fair and just trial. Illegally obtaining evidence can be altered (such as recording devices). Also, illegally obtaining evidence breaches a persons Human Rights set out in the European Convention for Human Rights as it would likely be a breach of their Right to Private Life (Article 8).

Generally, evidence that is not obtained properly and fairly is considered inadmissible

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

4d ago

This statement is based on a person's constitutional right to protection against unreasonable search and seizure, as outlined in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It aims to prevent law enforcement from violating individuals' rights by obtaining evidence through unlawful means.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in a court of law this statement is based on a person constitutional right to?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can a letter opened illegally be used in court as evidence?

No, evidence obtained illegally, including letters that were opened without permission, is generally not admissible in court due to the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in legal proceedings.


Can illegally obtained email be used in a criminal case?

The accused has the right to challenge the admissibility of any evidence used against them at trial. Whether an e-mail or any other evidence is "illegally obtained" is subject to the interpretation of the court, not the accused. If the court rules that evidence is obtained unlawfully, it can be suppressed at trial and not considered.


The practice of disallowing the admission in court of illegally obtained evidence is known as?

The exclusionary rule.


Evidence that is obtained illegally may not not be used in trial. What is this idea called?

exclusionary rule


Evidence that is obtained illegally may not be used in trial. What is this idea called?

exclusionary rule


Evidence that is obtained illegally may not be used in trial what is this idea called?

exclusionary rule


Evidence that is obtained illegally may not be used in a trial. What is this idea called?

exclusionary rule


Evidence that may not be used against a defendant in a criminal trial because it was obtained illegally is an example of the?

exclusionary rule


What rationale has the US Supreme Court adopted for excluding illegally obtained evidence from criminal trials?

Mapp v. Ohio


What is the rule that says evidence may not be used against a defendant in a criminal trial if it was obtained illegally.?

In law this is known as the exclusionary rule.


What is Illegally Obtained Evidence and its effects?

if an unlawful search of your property/residence/vehicle is conducted without your consent, and evidence of a crime is found, its an illegal search, the judge can throw out the evidence if an illegal search was done


What would you do if you have evidence that a married teacher and a married administrator at your daughter's high school are having an affair but you obtained the evidence illegally?

Unless you are willing to reveal your source of information, you have NO evidence. Evidence is only able to substantiate claims if it can be proved.