ANSWER: No one, at any time, can ever be forced to sign something against their will, and there is no law that would protect your employer for firing you because of your refusal to sign. There is a law against this type of criminal behavior. It's called coercion. Obstruction of justice is another. If the document is a government form then your employer is also guilty of simulation of legal process, acting under color of law, and fraud.
Yes, it is illegal for an organization to use coercion to make you sign a document. Coercion involves using threats, intimidation, or force to compel someone to do something against their will. If you feel you have been coerced into signing a document, you may have legal recourse.
There are a lot of circumstances that would dictate this. Was signing the document a precondition of employment, or is it a condition of continued employment? In that case, you have the choice to sign it and work, or don't sign and seek employment elsewhere. In an "at will" state, you can be terminated for any reason or no reason, so you would have little legal recourse. Outside of employment, a document signed "under duress", one that you are forced to sign by means of threat, does in many cases have no validity, but you must be prepared to demonstrate duress. You would need to contact a lawyer to get a proper opinion; it's too wide a question to answer here, and the answer varies with jurisdiction and with the specifics of the case.
yes
The prosecutor accused him of using coercive tactics to get the witness to change her testimony.
The similar meaning to compel is to coerce or to force someone to do something against their will.
What do you mean is a veiled threat "legal?" A threat is a threat. Threats are technically illegal. Are you saying, by veiling a threat, can you avoid responsibility for making the threat? It depends on who heard it and how well veiled it was. If more than your victim can understand the threat being made, you are not protected.
Highwaymen would typically ambush travelers on roads or highways, threatening them with violence or weapons to demand money or valuables. They used fear and intimidation to coerce victims into handing over their belongings.
Justice Black's reference to Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. in his opinion in the case of NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. was to highlight the distinction between protected peaceful boycotts and unlawful conduct that seeks to coerce individuals through violence or threats. In Giboney, the Supreme Court held that peaceful labor picketing is protected by the First Amendment, but coercive conduct that interferes with the rights of others is not. Justice Black invoked this case to clarify the limits of free speech and assembly in the context of boycotts and protests.
To coerce someone is to force them to do something against their will. It could also mean to persuade someone, though it used less commonly in this form. Eg. The blackmailer coerced the unfaithful husband into paying a bribe.
The prosecutor accused him of using coercive tactics to get the witness to change her testimony.
Questioner needs to define what they mean by "coercion" -BUT- as a GENERAL rule, yes, coercion is usually considered unlawful conduct.
No
Coerce.
Gangs have been known to coerce membership or force illegal acts by threatening recruits' families with bodily harm. Anything up to and including murder is possible.
Coarse=rough. Coerce=persuade
Yes
slang methods to coerce and control prostitutes
No, it would be totally illegal for a lawyer to coerce a client into sexual activity. It violates the Rules of Professional Responsibility that lawyers are sworn to uphold. Such violation should be reported to the appropriate Bar Association.
The spelling Cohorsing is a proper noun used to indicate shared horse boarding.The likely word is "coercing" (forcing, intimidating), from to coerce.
Bully, harass, frighten, and coerce.