0
While John Brown's passion and commitment to ending slavery are commendable, his use of violence can be seen as morally questionable. While some argue that violence was necessary to provoke change, others believe that non-violent methods could have been more effective in achieving the same goal. Overall, Brown's actions remain a point of controversy in the discussion of the abolitionist movement.
What else can I help you with?
How did Brown feel about the Free-Staters with their response to the violence in Kansas?
Brown admired the Free-Staters for their resistance to pro-slavery forces in Kansas. He believed in using violent means to fight against slavery, and he saw their actions as justifiable in the fight for freedom.
Was a radical settler who thought that abolitionist should use violence?
John Brown was a radical settler who believed in using violence to abolish slavery. He led a raid in 1859 on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry in an attempt to spark a slave rebellion. Brown was captured and later executed for his actions.
Who is perry brown wife she escaped slavery in Maryland?
Perry Brown's wife, Hannah Brown, escaped slavery in Maryland.
When did the Abolitionist John Brown kill four pro slavery men in Kansas?
John Brown killed four pro-slavery men in Pottawatomie Creek, Kansas on May 24, 1856. This event, known as the Pottawatomie massacre, was part of Brown's violent campaign against slavery in the Kansas Territory.
Who was john brown and what did he do at the pottawatomie creek?
John Brown was an American abolitionist who believed in using violent means to end slavery. At Pottawatomie Creek in May 1856, Brown and his followers killed five pro-slavery settlers in what became known as the Pottawatomie Massacre. This event further escalated the tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in Kansas during the Bleeding Kansas period.
John brown was right to use violence to protest slavery?
NO BITCHESS nope
John brown was right to use violence to protest slavery.?
NO BITCHESS nope
Do you think John brown was right to use violence to protest slavery?
The justification for John Brown's use of violence to protest slavery is a complex and contentious issue. Some argue that his actions were a necessary response to the extreme brutality and inhumanity of slavery, highlighting the urgency for abolition. Others contend that violence only perpetuated conflict and undermined the moral high ground of the anti-slavery movement. Ultimately, whether one sees Brown's actions as justified depends on their views about the efficacy and morality of violence in the pursuit of social justice.
Who used violence to try to end slavery?
John Brown
Who believed that only violence could end slavery?
john brown
Which person turned to violence to fight slavery?
You are probably thinking of John Brown.
Why did john brown's raid fail to unite forces that opposed slavery?
Northerners and Southerners were not ready to resort to violence to abolish slavery
Why john brown's raid failed to unite forces that oppose slavery?
Northerners and Southerners were not ready to resort to violence to abolish slavery
What did the opponents of slavery say about John Brown?
Some opponents of slavery praised John Brown's life and actions including his raid on Harpers Ferry. Other opponents of slavery were strongly against violence and for this reason did not approve of John Brown's actions.
What did John Brown believe would end slavery?
by using violence and killing most of the white men
What statement best explains why john brown failed to unite forces that opposed slavery?
Northerners and Southerners were not ready to resort to violence to abolish slavery
What was John brown philosophy about slavery?
John Brown believed that slavery was a grave moral injustice and that it must be abolished by any means necessary, including armed resistance if needed. He viewed slavery as a sin that required immediate action to end, regardless of the consequences. Brown's approach was radical and he was willing to use violence in his fight against slavery.
