0
The justification for John Brown's use of violence to protest slavery is a complex and contentious issue. Some argue that his actions were a necessary response to the extreme brutality and inhumanity of slavery, highlighting the urgency for abolition. Others contend that violence only perpetuated conflict and undermined the moral high ground of the anti-slavery movement. Ultimately, whether one sees Brown's actions as justified depends on their views about the efficacy and morality of violence in the pursuit of social justice.
What else can I help you with?
John brown was right to use violence to protest slavery?
NO BITCHESS nope
John brown was right to use violence to protest slavery.?
NO BITCHESS nope
John Brown was right to use violence to protest slavery explain?
While John Brown's passion and commitment to ending slavery are commendable, his use of violence can be seen as morally questionable. While some argue that violence was necessary to provoke change, others believe that non-violent methods could have been more effective in achieving the same goal. Overall, Brown's actions remain a point of controversy in the discussion of the abolitionist movement.
Does India have the right to protest?
Not in practice.
Right to protest during wartimes?
In the US, it's a right.
Is the Westboro Batist church legal to protest?
They have the 1st amendment right to protest on public property, so your answer is yes. Even though they do have the right it seems as if they are not respecting the family of the fallen solider in their protest at the funeral.
Do 13 year olds have the right to protest?
a 13 year old should have the right to protest its part of the 10 admenents that make our counrty how it s today if you are going to protest on the street then you need a primit in order to voice your oipnoins out in public also you have to protest peacfully
What is freedom of petitioning?
Right to protest the government
What did the Kansas-Nebraska act give voters in the Kansas and Nebraska territories the right to do?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 granted voters in the Kansas and Nebraska territories the right to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery through the principle of popular sovereignty. This meant that the settlers in those territories could vote on the legality of slavery, leading to significant conflict and violence, particularly in Kansas, as pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions clashed. The act effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise, which had previously restricted slavery in those regions.
Which amendment in the United States Constitution gives people the right to peacefully protest?
The First Amendment in the United States Constitution gives people the right to peacefully protest.
How did the Kansas- Nebraska act lead to violence in Kansas?
The Kansas - Nebraska Act was passed with the idea that the citizens could decide amongst themselves whether to vote for slavery or not. In Nebraska the non slavery group was fairly well established. Not the same thing however in Kansas. There bitter and Strong feelings on both sides of the issue resulted in violence between pro and anti slavery groups.
Do you support the gays in protesting chick-fil-a why or why not?
The right to protest is guaranteed under the US constitution. We all have to support the freedom to protest, even if we do not support the protest itself.
