0
Legal restrictions that curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are subject to the most rigid scrutiny. But, pressing public necessity may sometimes justify such restrictions.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
In Korematsu v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was constitutional based on the government's wartime powers. The decision has been widely criticized as a violation of civil rights and viewed as an example of the government overstepping its authority during times of crisis. However, the ruling has never been formally overturned by the Supreme Court.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What amendments did the supreme court case of korematsu vs US violate?
The Supreme Court case Korematsu v. United States violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by allowing the internment of Japanese Americans based on their ethnicity. It also violated the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause by depriving individuals of their freedom without sufficient justification.
Was Fletcher v Peck a decision of strict construction?
No, Fletcher v. Peck was not a decision of strict construction. The case involved a land dispute and the Supreme Court's ruling upheld the sanctity of contracts, emphasizing the importance of property rights and the rule of law.
In many states in the US whites and blacks were not permitted to marry This is an example of the rule of?
This is an example of the rule of segregation, which enforced racial separation and discrimination based on skin color. This practice was legally sanctioned in many states in the US until it was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in the case of Loving v. Virginia in 1967.
Fundamental doctrines of Constitutional search and seizure law were revolutionized in part by the Supreme Court in the 1960s by?
The Warren Court
What years of time was the separate but equal doctrine the law of the land in the US?
The separate but equal doctrine was the law of the land in the US from the late 19th century until 1954. In the 1896 case of Plessy v. Ferguson the US Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation was legal as long as the separate facilities for each race were equal. This ruling set a constitutional precedent making segregation legal throughout the country. The ruling was not overturned until 1954 when the Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Board of Education declared that segregating children in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
What are some real world examples of rule of law?
US v. Nixon
What did the supreme court decide in Korematsu v. US?
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
Who was Chief Justice in the US Supreme Court case Korematsu v. United States?
Korematsu v. United States, 323 US 214 (1944)Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone (1941-1946) presided over the Court for the Korematsu case, a challenge to the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 that established Japanese Internment Camps during World War II.
In the case Korematsu v the US the supreme Court ruled that relocation of Japanese Americans was.?
Omg based god !
What did the supreme court decide in case korematsu v. US?
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
Who won the US Supreme Court case Korematsu v US?
The United States won, as Fred Korematsu was not granted his appeal and was sent to an internment camp, and none of the Japanese-American's cases were looked into. This fool has no idea what he is talking about... he was not even close to knowing what really happened with Fred Korematsu. Korematsu won this as some would say "battle" against the United States. Fred Korematsu did not have to go to the internment camp.
Korematsu v. U.S?
(1941) *Executive Powers
What did the supreme court case US v Nixon confirmed?
The rule of law over executive privilege.
What is the significance of korematsu v. us?
Korematsu v United States (1944) remains a profound case and precedent in the study of civil liberties and American Constitutional law. The chief significance was the Courts majority opinion that national security (against espionage) was a compelling interest enough that the use of internment was/is justified.
Who was korematsuv US?
It is Korematsu v US and was a landmark Supreme Court decision allowing the USA government to place Japanese Americans in internment camps during WWII.
Strict scrutiny was first used in what case?
Korematsu v. United States
Which supreme court case where minority rights ignored?
Korematsu v. United States
