where is the answer...
The Supreme Court case that upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was Korematsu v. United States (1944). The Court ruled that the internment was justified due to military necessity, a decision that has been widely criticized as a violation of civil liberties.
In Korematsu v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was constitutional based on the government's wartime powers. The decision has been widely criticized as a violation of civil rights and viewed as an example of the government overstepping its authority during times of crisis. However, the ruling has never been formally overturned by the Supreme Court.
Yes, Scotland has its own Supreme Court called the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. It is the highest court of appeal for civil cases in Scotland, separate from the Supreme Court of England and Wales.
After the Civil War, the Supreme Court issued rulings that established important legal precedents, such as defining the scope of federal power and upholding the legality of certain civil rights laws. The Court also played a role in shaping the Reconstruction era by interpreting the post-war amendments, particularly the 14th Amendment, which granted citizenship and equal protection under the law to formerly enslaved individuals.
There are many different supreme courts - one of the US and one for each of the States. They have different numbers of judges, depending on the Constitution of each state. There are eight judges on the US Supreme Court (Nine seats for judges).
No, the US Supreme Court cannot violate the Constitution. The Court's role is to interpret and apply the Constitution, ensuring that laws and actions adhere to its provisions. While opinions on interpretations may vary, the Court's decisions are binding and can only be overturned or altered through subsequent legal proceedings or constitutional amendments.
Korematsu v. United States
validate a descrimination on the basis of ancestry
Supreme Court Case Korematsu V. United States (1944)
The amendments are not ignored. They are used daily in court and cases that come before the Supreme Court.
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, which all government officials swear to uphold. Supreme Court decisions are subordinate to constitutional amendments, and represent one of the few ways a Supreme Court decision can be changed.
Omg based god !
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
the supreme court
Korematsu v. United States, 323 US 214 (1944)Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone (1941-1946) presided over the Court for the Korematsu case, a challenge to the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 that established Japanese Internment Camps during World War II.
The 14th and 15th Amendments were undermined by the Supreme Court because the court ruled that Congress was not able to punish a state or states that violated the civil rights of African-Americans. The purpose of the amendments was to correct injustices that had resulted from slavery.