answersLogoWhite

0

where is the answer...

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

What supreme court case put Japanese in internment camps?

The Supreme Court case that upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was Korematsu v. United States (1944). The Court ruled that the internment was justified due to military necessity, a decision that has been widely criticized as a violation of civil liberties.


Rule of law for korematsu v US?

In Korematsu v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was constitutional based on the government's wartime powers. The decision has been widely criticized as a violation of civil rights and viewed as an example of the government overstepping its authority during times of crisis. However, the ruling has never been formally overturned by the Supreme Court.


Does Scotland have a Supreme Court?

Yes, Scotland has its own Supreme Court called the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. It is the highest court of appeal for civil cases in Scotland, separate from the Supreme Court of England and Wales.


What did the Supreme Court do after the Civil War?

After the Civil War, the Supreme Court issued rulings that established important legal precedents, such as defining the scope of federal power and upholding the legality of certain civil rights laws. The Court also played a role in shaping the Reconstruction era by interpreting the post-war amendments, particularly the 14th Amendment, which granted citizenship and equal protection under the law to formerly enslaved individuals.


How many judges consist of supreme court?

There are many different supreme courts - one of the US and one for each of the States. They have different numbers of judges, depending on the Constitution of each state. There are eight judges on the US Supreme Court (Nine seats for judges).

Related Questions

Can the US Supreme Court violate the Constitution?

No, the US Supreme Court cannot violate the Constitution. The Court's role is to interpret and apply the Constitution, ensuring that laws and actions adhere to its provisions. While opinions on interpretations may vary, the Court's decisions are binding and can only be overturned or altered through subsequent legal proceedings or constitutional amendments.


Which supreme court case where minority rights ignored?

Korematsu v. United States


On what constitutional basis did the supreme court deny korematsu's appeal?

validate a descrimination on the basis of ancestry


What was the name of the court case that upheld the interment of Japanese?

Supreme Court Case Korematsu V. United States (1944)


Which amendments we ignored?

The amendments are not ignored. They are used daily in court and cases that come before the Supreme Court.


What did the supreme court decide in Korematsu v. US?

The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy


Why can amendments to the Constitution negate Supreme Court decisions?

The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, which all government officials swear to uphold. Supreme Court decisions are subordinate to constitutional amendments, and represent one of the few ways a Supreme Court decision can be changed.


In the case Korematsu v the US the supreme Court ruled that relocation of Japanese Americans was.?

Omg based god !


What did the supreme court decide in case korematsu v. US?

The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy


Which branch of government introduces amendments to the constitution?

the supreme court


Who was Chief Justice in the US Supreme Court case Korematsu v. United States?

Korematsu v. United States, 323 US 214 (1944)Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone (1941-1946) presided over the Court for the Korematsu case, a challenge to the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 that established Japanese Internment Camps during World War II.


How did the supreme court undermine the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments?

The 14th and 15th Amendments were undermined by the Supreme Court because the court ruled that Congress was not able to punish a state or states that violated the civil rights of African-Americans. The purpose of the amendments was to correct injustices that had resulted from slavery.