In some states this information might not be 'public record', and could be considered
confidential investigatory material. You will have to consult with your attorney to detemine the procedures and rulings on this in your particular state.
It means that the state believes that the defendant has violated the conditions of the bond or there is some reason that the state believes that the defendant should be confined while waiting for trial.
A presentence investigation report (PSI) is a legal term referring to the investigation into the history of person convicted of a crime before sentencing to determine if there are extenuating circumstances which should ameliorate the sentence or a history of criminal behavior to increase the harshness of the sentence. (taken from Wikipedia article on PSI)
The defendant should review the Writ of Prohibition to understand the allegations and reasons for it being filed. It is advisable to consult with an attorney experienced in handling such matters to discuss the next steps and potential defenses. It may also be necessary to prepare a response or motion to challenge the Writ.
A misdemeanor for show cause typically means that the defendant has failed to comply with court orders or show up for a hearing, and a judge has issued a show cause order requiring them to appear in court and explain why they did not follow court instructions. This can lead to further consequences such as fines, probation, or even jail time.
Under current law, a defendant has an absolute right to bail if the custody time limits have expired and otherwise ordinarily a right to bail unless there is sufficient reason not to grant it,Any person accused of committing a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Therefore a person charged with a crime, should not be denied freedom unless there is a good reason.The main reasons for refusing bail are that the defendant is accused of an imprisonable offence and there are substantial grounds for believing that the defendant would:abscond, orcommit further offences whilst on bail, orinterfere with witnesses.The court should take into account:the nature and seriousness of the offence or default (and the probable method of dealing with the defendant for it),the character, antecedents, associations and community ties of the defendant,the defendant's bail record, andthe strength of the evidence.The court may also refuse bail:for the defendant's own protection;where the defendant is already serving a custodial sentence for another offence;where the court is satisfied that it has not been practicable to obtain sufficient information;where the defendant has already absconded in the present proceedings;where the defendant has been convicted but the court is awaiting a pre-sentence report, other report or inquiry and it would be impracticable to complete the inquiries or make the report without keeping the defendant in custody;where the defendant is charged with a non-imprisonable offence, has already been released on bail for the offence with which he is now accused, and has been arrested for absconding or breaching bail.Where the accused has previous convictions for certain homicide or sexual offences, the burden of proof is on the defendant to rebut a presumption against bail.
"defendant" should not be capitalized unless it is paired with a proper name.
Pretty much no.
No, the defendant is being tried on the charge that is before the jury, and the past history of the defendant does not, and should not be applied.
he said that only landowners should be permitted to vote or in other words the "rich"
it is in the very front of the book, real easy
No, they should not!
You need to express your remorse for what you did. You also need to explain the lesson that you have learned, and the reasons why you will never break the law again.
If the wrong defendant is named in a lawsuit, the plaintiff's attorney should be contacted to correct the mistake and ensure the proper party is identified and served with the lawsuit.
No
The defense of personal injury lawsuit should be proving that the defendant is not guilty of negligence. This can be done by showing that there was not a duty of care owed by the defendant to the prosecution or that the defendant was not truly injured or the injuries were not directly related to the defendant. Below is a link to an article stating the steps of proving negligence.
Yes.
(in the US) There is no such plea. (although there probably should be)