People under British law in the 1700's who owed money could be executed, turned into a slave, or had to go to jail
In the 1700s under British law, people who owed money could be sent to debtor's prison. Debtors could be imprisoned until their debts were paid off or until they received outside help to secure their release.
exacuted?
In the 1700s, British common law typically did not allow unmarried women to inherit directly from their father's estate. Instead, the inheritance would pass to the closest male relative, such as a brother or uncle. Unmarried women had limited legal rights and were often economically dependent on male relatives.
By the mid 1700s, slaves in Virginia were able to establish their own communities, develop their own cultural practices, and sometimes earn small plots of land where they could grow their own food. However, their rights and freedoms were still severely limited and controlled by their owners.
Musicians were often appointed to court positions in the 1700s because they added cultural refinement and entertainment to the court. Their music could enhance the prestige and grandeur of royal events and ceremonies, showcasing the wealth and sophistication of the court. Hiring talented musicians also helped demonstrate the ruler's support for the arts and patronage of artists.
Sick people could be restrained by magistrates through quarantine measures, isolation in designated facilities, or by issuing stay-at-home orders. In some cases, individuals who were considered a risk to public health could be physically restrained or detained under government authority.
Georgia was initially founded as a colony for debtors in 1733 by British philanthropist James Oglethorpe, providing them with a chance for a fresh start and economic opportunity.
A British fort is a place where British soldiers could recuperate. Other soldiers could inspect the area they are in. These were used in the 1700s and 1800s.
People could identify with the stories of everyday life.
People could identify with the stories of everyday life.
so they could catch food to eat and it was easier to settle
A. the lack of freedom under British rule
In the 1700s, British common law typically did not allow unmarried women to inherit directly from their father's estate. Instead, the inheritance would pass to the closest male relative, such as a brother or uncle. Unmarried women had limited legal rights and were often economically dependent on male relatives.
Very unlikely.
Because when you grow up then you could be one that say the British rules.
The people of Boston did not think very highly of the British soldiers. They did not feel they could trust them and refused to allow them in their homes even under the British Parliament's orders to do so.
The reasons why the colonies broke away could fill volumes. Libraries are full of books on early US history.They faced similar problems after British rule as they did under British rule. The main difference was the people were now self ruled and self determining and were represented in government
gunsmith
the people in the 1800s wore things like whool and homegrown cotton hope this could help!!