People under British law in the 1700's who owed money could be executed, turned into a slave, or had to go to jail
In the 1700s, British common law typically did not allow unmarried women to inherit directly from their father's estate. Instead, the inheritance would pass to the closest male relative, such as a brother or uncle. Unmarried women had limited legal rights and were often economically dependent on male relatives.
By the mid 1700s, slaves in Virginia were able to establish their own communities, develop their own cultural practices, and sometimes earn small plots of land where they could grow their own food. However, their rights and freedoms were still severely limited and controlled by their owners.
Sick people could be restrained by magistrates through quarantine measures, isolation in designated facilities, or by issuing stay-at-home orders. In some cases, individuals who were considered a risk to public health could be physically restrained or detained under government authority.
Georgia was initially founded as a colony for debtors in 1733 by British philanthropist James Oglethorpe, providing them with a chance for a fresh start and economic opportunity.
Both peasants and farmers could become slaves under various historical systems such as in ancient Rome, where people could be enslaved due to debt or as a result of war. Once enslaved, individuals would lose their freedom and become the property of their masters, forced to work without pay and without any rights.
A British fort is a place where British soldiers could recuperate. Other soldiers could inspect the area they are in. These were used in the 1700s and 1800s.
Yes, people did wear glasses in the 1700s, though they were not as common or accessible as they are today. Eyeglasses were often expensive and considered a luxury item, so not everyone could afford them.
People could identify with the stories of everyday life.
People could identify with the stories of everyday life.
so they could catch food to eat and it was easier to settle
A. the lack of freedom under British rule
Very unlikely.
Because when you grow up then you could be one that say the British rules.
The people of Boston did not think very highly of the British soldiers. They did not feel they could trust them and refused to allow them in their homes even under the British Parliament's orders to do so.
The reasons why the colonies broke away could fill volumes. Libraries are full of books on early US history.They faced similar problems after British rule as they did under British rule. The main difference was the people were now self ruled and self determining and were represented in government
gunsmith
the people in the 1800s wore things like whool and homegrown cotton hope this could help!!