their slaves getting an education. apex
Slaveholders claimed the Wilmot Proviso was unconstitutional because they argued that it violated the Fifth Amendment rights of slaveholders by depriving them of their property (slaves) without due process of law. They believed that Congress did not have the authority to ban slavery in the territories.
One argument used by southern slaveholders to justify slavery was that it was necessary for the economy to thrive, as it provided cheap labor that boosted agricultural production and profitability. They also argued that slaves were intellectually inferior and needed the guidance of white slaveholders for their own well-being.
Under the Emancipation Proclamation and the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which abolished slavery, former slaveholders were not entitled to seek compensation for the loss of their slaves. The abolition of slavery was a fundamental shift in societal values and the legal framework, and as a result, former slaveholders were not compensated for the economic loss incurred.
Former slaves and former slaveholders often disagreed over issues such as land ownership, labor rights, and equality. Former slaves sought land ownership and economic independence, while former slaveholders resisted granting them full rights and opportunities. These disagreements contributed to ongoing tensions and conflicts in the Reconstruction era.
Former slaveholders defined their freedom as the ability to control their own lives and make choices without interference. They viewed their slaves' freedom as being limited to following the orders and expectations set by the slaveholder, often believing that they were providing necessary guidance and protection. This perspective also arose from a belief in the superiority of the slaveholders and their right to dominate others.
A principal reason for opposing slavery's expansion was a fear of competition with Southern slaveholders.
Slaveholders often oppose educating slaves because they fear that education will lead to discontent and rebellion among the enslaved population. They believe that keeping slaves ignorant and illiterate helps maintain control and perpetuate the institution of slavery.
Well they Sure As Crap beat themm strupid slaveholders wonder if they'd have thought twice to do that agin if someone turned the whip in their direction!
The resource that led to Brazil being the most slaveholders in the World was sugarcane.
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution
because they hated blacks like most southerners still do today.. end of story.
its not true because most of the presidents believed that slavery wasn't good
Below is a reference to the slaveholder status of 21 of the most prominent signatories of the Declaration of Independence. A full two thirds of these individuals were slaveholders. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1269536/The-Founding-Fathers-and-Slavery
There is nothing to fear but fear itself. The fear of the unknown
Bad
the different ways that slaveholders encouraged obedience from their slaves was to offer them more food and better living conditions.
To prevent the government from taking away the rights of slaveholders