"His lawyer" could be a direct object or indirect object, but it could not be an adverb. In "He called his lawyer", "his lawyer" is a direct object. In "He showed his lawyer the contract", "his lawyer" is an indirect object.
The noun clause "that accused his lawyer of lying" is functioning as the direct object of the verb "accused." It provides more information about the action being performed within the main clause of the sentence.
The noun clause is 'what happened next' which is functioning as the object of the preposition 'at'.
The preposition is about; the object of the preposition is riots.
"Servus" is the nominative form of the Latin word meaning "slave" or "servant," while "servum" is the accusative form. "Servus" is used when the word is the subject of a sentence, while "servum" is used when the word is the direct object.
The verb does not have a direct object in the sentence, "She is insecure."
There is no direct object in that sentence.
There is no direct object in that sentence.
There is no direct object in that sentence.
There is no direct object in this sentence.
In the sentence 'you have her a surprise gift', 'her' is an indirect object. 'Gift' is the direct object in that sentence.
Yes, and very often. Example: "This sentence has a direct object." where object is the D.O.
That sentence does not contain a direct object.
"song" is the direct object in that sentence.
Personality is the direct object in that sentence.
A direct or indirect object is a part of a sentence. A single word in isolation is neither a direct or indirect object. However, most nouns can be used in a sentence as either a direct or indirect object.
In the sentence "Your visit to the museum was educational", "visit" is the direct object. An indirect object would typically receive the direct object, such as in the sentence "I gave her a gift" where "her" is the indirect object receiving the direct object "gift".