answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

issue

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

2d ago

The remaining disputed legal issue between two parties in an action is known as the "legal question" or "controversy." It represents the specific point of contention that the court must resolve in order to reach a decision in the case.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the law matter remaining in dispute between two parties in an action?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

What is the nature of an ordinary civil action?

An ordinary civil action is a legal dispute between two parties seeking resolution through the court system. It typically involves a plaintiff seeking damages or other forms of relief from a defendant based on a violation of civil laws or contractual obligations. The goal is to have the court determine liability and provide a remedy to the injured party.


Can you sue after a settlement in small claims court?

Usually, once a settlement is reached in small claims court and both parties agree to its terms, there is little room to sue again for the same dispute. The settlement agreement typically serves as a final resolution to the matter. If one party breaches the settlement agreement, the other party may have grounds to bring a legal action to enforce the agreement, but it would not be a new lawsuit on the original dispute.


What is a civil case also known as?

A civil case is also known as a lawsuit or a legal action brought by a person or entity seeking to resolve a dispute with another party in a court of law.


What are the similarities and differences between tort law and law of contract?

Similarities: Both tort law and contract law are branches of civil law that deal with legal obligations between parties. Both involve compensation for harm caused, although the basis for liability differs - tort law seeks to compensate for harm caused by wrongful conduct, while contract law addresses breaches of agreements. Differences: Tort law deals with duties imposed by law to prevent harm to others, while contract law is based on voluntary agreements between parties. Tort law focuses on providing compensation for harm suffered, whereas contract law seeks to enforce promises made in agreements. In tort law, the duty owed is generally imposed by law, while in contract law, the duty arises from the agreement between the parties.


What is the legal term for the geographic district in which a legal action is tried?

The legal term for the geographic district in which a legal action is tried is "venue." It determines the specific court where a case will be heard based on factors such as where the events leading to the case occurred or where the parties reside.

Related questions

What is an agreement between two or more parties that is enforceable in court?

Contract. There are two forms of enforceable actions in court under this question: 1) A Written Contract - signed by all parties, and any amendments to the contract 2) A verbal agreement, where it can be shown there was some form of agreement between he parties, and that one or more parties took action to fulfill the terms of the agreement (action to fulfill the terms constitutes a binding contract)


Can they arrest you for not handing in your car?

I'm going to assume that you are referring to a repossession action stemming from non-payment on the loan. Or maybe at this point you are being harassed by a debt collection agency. The short answer is no. This is a breach of contract. You can be arrested for committing crimes, but breach of contract is not a crime. The police have absolutely no jurisdiction in a contract dispute between to private parties.


What is power shairing?

A policy agreed between political parties or within a coalition to share responsibility for decision-making and political action.


If there is a dispute over ownership of property would a state have diversity jurisdiction in personam jurisdiction in rem jurisdiction or no jurisdiction at all?

Diversity jurisdiction is a basis for federal courts to exercise jurisdiction if the parties to a civil cause of action are residents of different states and the amount in controversy is large enough to make use of federal resources practical. A state may legitimately exercise jurisdiction either if it has in rem jurisdiction over the property or in personam jurisdiction over all parties to the dispute.


Can I abolish a restrictive covenant?

Since a covenant is an agreement between two or more parties, usually all parties must agree to abolishment. Another course of action is through the courts. One much prove that the covenant is injurious and detrimental to one or all of the parties.


How mediation can help to resolve conflicts within the community?

Mediation allows both parties of a dispute to air their grievance in a less formal forum. Unlike most Courts of Law, the idea is not to find innocence/guilt but to find a compromise between the aggrieved parties without stigma or penalty. Mediation is part of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (A.D.R.) regime and uses an independant and impartial mediator to help the parties reach a mutual agreement. If say, two neighbours were warring over a fencing dispute, the consequence could be an assault and criminal repurcussions. In my professional capacity, I saw this happen on many occasions and was called in to take legal action with all its ramifications; with the original dispute still unresolved. The parties then would start to feud about the violence, the Court appearance, monetary penalties and it would just escalate like there was no tomorrow. When I was called in as a mediator, the dispute could often be resolved to mutual satisfaction; both parties being helped to see the issue at hand without resorting to a bit of 'biffo'. The parties could also be helped to understand that even civil litigation is not always desirable as any savings gained by not having to pay for the fence (or whatever) is more than negated by the cost of our friends from the law firms. As Elton John said; 'The legal boys have won again And you and I have lost They can't tell us how it happened But they'll let us know the cost.'


What are the four ways to settle a dispute out of court?

intro: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is the name given to the process where parties in a dispute come to a compromise (or settle their dispute) without going to court.The main reason people use ADR is to save the expense of using the courts and solicitors.There are 4 main forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR)arbitration, mediation, negociation and conciliation(AMNC)Arbitration - Arbitration is the most formal of the methods used to settle disputes without using the courts. Arbitration is where the parties with a disagreement pass their dispute to a third party, who will make a judgment on their behalf. This judgment will then be legally binding on the parties.The relevant law on arbitration can be found in the Arbitration Act 1996.The agreement to go to arbitration can be made by the parties at any time. It can be written into a business contract by what is called a Scott v Avery clause or the parties may just agree on arbitration when a dispute arises.The parties can agree the number of arbitrators who will hear their dispute. It could be three, two or just one person. The parties will normally appoint someone who is an expert in their particular area of business. There is also the Institute of Arbitrators who will provide trained arbitrators to parties who wish to settle a dispute.The actual procedure to be followed in any arbitration hearing is left to the parties to decide. Therefore, arbitration hearings can take many forms. The parties can decide on a paper arbitration, which means the parties submit everything to the arbitrator in writing, who will then read everything and make a decision. However the parties can also have a hearing at which they appear and give evidence and witnesses may be called.The decision made by the arbitrator is called an award and is legally binding on the parties.Mediation - This is where a neutral person (the mediator) helps the parties to reach a compromise. The job of the mediator is to consult with each party and see how much common ground there is between them. S/he should act as a facilitator, taking offers between the parties. The mediator doesn't offer an opinion. Mediation is most suitable where there is some chance that the parties will co-operate. Mediation is not legally binding on the parties.Mediation ServicesThere are a number of organisations that offer mediation services. One of the main ones is the Centre for Dispute Resolution Many companies use their mediation services to save £1,000s in legal fees. The only disadvantage of using mediation to settle a dispute is there is no guarantee that a settlement will be reached. This means that you still have to use the courts, so in effect failure at the mediation stage can result in extra delays and extra costs.However, the Centre for Dispute Resolution report that around 80% of the disputes they deal with are settled without the need for any court action.There are now many mediation services offered on-line such as The Mediation Room and MediateNegociation - This type of method of solving a dispute without having to go to court is the most basic. To solve a case, both parties must simply meet each other somewhere and 'negociate' the matter. If this is not possible by the parties then a solocitor may negociate on their behalf. If the dispute is still not solved and court proceedings start, then the solicitor may still negociate on their behalf. This results in many cases settled out of court.Conciliation - This is similar to mediation where a neutral third party helps the parties to resolve their dispute; however, the conciliator plays a more active role in the process. S/he will be expected to suggest ways in which a compromise could be reached. Conciliation is not legally binding on the parties.Conciliation ServicesThe Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) is used by many employers and Trade Unions to settle disputes before (and sometimes during) industrial action takes place.ACAS offers conciliation to both sides in unfair dismissal claims before the claim can be taken to an Employment Tribunal. Around 60% of unfair dismissal claims are settled without the need for a hearing at an Employment Tribunal.


Taking action to settle an international dispute can be blocked in the security council by the veto of?

The Answer is (D) any if these.


What is the value of a savage 322?

these 22 hornet bolt action savage,s are worth between 150-450 dollars depending on the amount of original finish remaining.


How does adr compare to civil litigation?

Civil litigation means legal action between two parties - neither of which is a government charging a crime. In other words, I sue a company or a person sues me for an action. ADR means dozens of things (American Depository Receipts, and many more). Assuming you mean Alternative Dispute Resolution this is a non-court-based way to resolve civil disputes without litigation in court. An arbiter is chosen and both sides agree to abide by the arbiter's decision.


What are Ends that remain unsatisfied after taking an action called?

Outstanding or remaining circumstances


What are people's reactions to ozone depletion?

Everything from parties to panic, denial to action.