answersLogoWhite

0

how Rodney Kings case was reformed is by the beating of a white person's and it change history forever because they felt is was a act of racism, and it has caused a commotion with all blacks in the world or have seen it it has caused riots over 7,00 people were arrested and 54 people died and there was not even 1 African-American in the jury for the Rodney King Trial. But luckily, he has 3.8 million dollars for compensation.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

What can you say about the judge kill its case?

It is unethical and illegal for a judge to kill a case. Judges are expected to preside over cases impartially and fairly, and any attempt to manipulate the outcome of a case is a violation of judicial ethics and can lead to severe consequences, including removal from the bench. If there are concerns about a judge's behavior in a case, it should be addressed through appropriate legal channels.


Who was the lead prosecutor in Nuremberg trails?

The lead prosecutor in the Nuremberg trials was Robert H. Jackson, the Chief United States Prosecutor. He played a significant role in presenting the case against the Nazi war criminals to the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg after World War II.


What happens when the plaintiff does not show up for a subpoena on a lawsuit?

If the plaintiff does not show up for a subpoena in a lawsuit, the court may dismiss the case or rule against the plaintiff. Failure to comply with a subpoena can lead to penalties such as fines or imprisonment for contempt of court. Additionally, the plaintiff may lose credibility with the court and damage their case.


What is the difference between a king and a chief?

A king holds a formal position of authority within a monarchy, often hereditary, with absolute power over his subjects. A chief, on the other hand, is a leader in a tribal or clan-based society, typically chosen for their wisdom, bravery, or ability to lead, with authority derived from their community's respect and support.


Why was the Scott vs Sanford case important?

The Scott v. Sanford case, also known as the Dred Scott decision, was significant because it ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. It also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, leading to heightened tensions over the issue of slavery and playing a significant role in the lead-up to the Civil War in the United States.