Any and all judge should be able to do this.
The proper term is a "Neutral and Detached Magistrate" (magistrate or judge).
This simply means that the judge or magistrate should have no personal interest or gains in the case at hand.
If a judge dies during a trial, a new judge would typically be assigned to the case to ensure continuity and proceed with the trial. The new judge would review the case documents and proceedings before making any decisions or rulings.
Yes, it happens quite frequently. If the judge holds a hearing at which both sides present their evidence, information and documentation, if it is clear, under the law, which party is the prevailing party, the judge can render a legally binding decision. If you do not agree you may file an appeal to the judge's decision.
Solomon and the judge in a just judge are similar in that they are both figures responsible for making fair and wise decisions in legal matters. They both aim to uphold justice and ensure a just outcome in disputes brought before them.
Judge Alex Bacani Ferrer was born in Havana, Cuba. At an early age his family emigrated to the US. At such an age he was brought up bilingual. His parents' first language was Spanish (on both sides) and his abuelos only spoke Spanish.
the duties of the judge is to decide punishment of the convicted. By hearing both sides of a party for instance in the state of Ohio before someone is proven guilty the prosecutor has to decide the mental state. That means did the person commit the crime accidentally, knowingly, or on purpose. At someone dies Do to my actions the prosecutor is going to charge me with murder. if I did it on purpose it's murder, if I did one accident its negligent, or reckless homicide. The state of Ohio or any other state in the union the law has a amount of time for punishment it is the judge's decision by listening to the story to determine if the person goes to jail for life or to be executed, or only do a few years.
An arbitrator is a third party who hears both sides of an argument and then makes an impartial decision. The decision announced by an arbitrator is often as binding as if it was announced by a judge.
compromise
a mediator
After both sides in the case have finished presenting their casss and have 'rested,' both the prosecution and the defense (in criminal cases) or the plaintiff and the defense (in civil trials) present to the judge and/or jury what is known as their "closing argument" in which they summarize their view of the case and try to convince the judge or jury to their point-of-view.
good manegment , the ability to listen to both sides of a argument :) xx
It is evidence that can tend to support both sides of a question, argument, or case.
So you can give a fair judgement.
Give both sides of the argument
I would say that they are the ability of a person to see the relative perspective of both sides of an argument with the additional ability to see a path to guide them to an agreement both sides can live with.
You already guessed that there are two sides to this argument, and they have both been fairly well expressed by now. Additionally, the issue is fairly black and white. It's "I don't want anyone to endanger my health" on one side, and "I have rights, and I want to exercise them by smoking when and where I want to without government infringing on them."
A balanced argument presents both sides of an issue without bias, allowing for a fair assessment of the topic. It involves acknowledging different perspectives and providing evidence or reasoning to support each viewpoint. Ultimately, a balanced argument aims to help readers or listeners make informed decisions based on a comprehensive understanding of all sides of the argument.
It is not meant in the usual meaning of the word. It simply means to present your side of the "argument" to the court. Both you and the oppoosing side of "the argument" present your cases to the court and the judge (or the jury) decide, according to the law, which person "wins" the "argument."