0
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between Nuremberg trials and Nuremberg laws?
The Nuremberg trials were a series of military tribunals held after World War II to prosecute prominent Nazi leaders for war crimes, while the Nuremberg Laws were antisemitic legislation introduced in Nazi Germany in 1935 that defined Jews and implemented racial discrimination. The trials aimed to hold individuals accountable for their actions during the war, while the laws aimed to establish legal discrimination against Jews.
What were the Nuremberg laws and what happened at the Nuremberg trials?
The Nuremberg Laws were a set of antisemitic laws in Nazi Germany that stripped Jews of their rights and citizenship. The Nuremberg Trials were a series of military tribunals held after World War II to prosecute prominent Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
Was there controversy in the Nuremberg Trials?
Yes, there was controversy surrounding the Nuremberg Trials, particularly regarding the legality of retroactively applying new laws to prosecute war crimes, the fairness of the trials, and the scope of punishment. Some critics argued that the trials were victor's justice and undermined the defendants' right to a fair trial.
Who is franz schlegelberger at the Nuremberg trials?
Franz Schlegelberger was a German jurist who served as the Reich Ministry of Justice under the Nazi regime. He was indicted at the Nuremberg Trials for crimes against humanity for his role in implementing Nazi laws, including the Nuremberg Laws. Schlegelberger claimed he was unaware of the extent of the atrocities committed by the Nazis and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.
What are Nuremberg trials during the holocaust?
they where certaint laws made up by the Nazis they where certaint laws made up by the Nazis No they are not, they are the convictions of the 21 leaders and happend in 1945 to 1949 Nuremberg laws were made by the Nazis not the trials
What is the difference between Nuremberg trials and Nuremberg laws?
The Nuremberg trials were a series of military tribunals held after World War II to prosecute prominent Nazi leaders for war crimes, while the Nuremberg Laws were antisemitic legislation introduced in Nazi Germany in 1935 that defined Jews and implemented racial discrimination. The trials aimed to hold individuals accountable for their actions during the war, while the laws aimed to establish legal discrimination against Jews.
Who was persecuted after World War 2?
Between 1945 and 1946, German officials involved in the holocaust and other war crimes were brought before an international tribunal in the Nuremberg Trials. The Soviet union had wanted these trials to take place in Berlin, but Nuremberg was chosen as the site for the trials for specific reasons. They chose Nuremberg as the spot for the trials because 6 years before Hitler created the Nuremberg Laws. The Nuremberg Laws were a collection of 2,000 laws that said what Jews could and could not do. By, Husky Pratt Special thanks to Wikipedia.com for helping me spell Nuremberg right.
Why were the Nuremberg trails significant?
The Nuremberg trials were significant because Nuremberg was the city in Germany where the Nuremberg Laws were created, which deprived Jews of German citizenship. The trials were held in Nuremberg because it was almost like a punishment for the Nazis.
What were the Nuremberg laws and what happened at the Nuremberg trials?
The Nuremberg Laws were a set of antisemitic laws in Nazi Germany that stripped Jews of their rights and citizenship. The Nuremberg Trials were a series of military tribunals held after World War II to prosecute prominent Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
Why did the Nuremberg Trials take place in Nuremberg?
It was rather a ironic and symbolic place to hold the trials. From 1927-1938, the Nazis held major rallies there. It was there where the Nazis passed the Nuremberg Laws, outlawing the Jews doing really anything.
What were the affects of the Nuremberg Laws?
The Nürnberg Laws (as distinct from the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, a more or less unrelated set of trials that happened to be held about ten years later in the same city where the laws were introduced) were a set of anti-semitic laws passed in Nazi Germany in 1935. You can see the related links for a detailed explanation.
Was there controversy in the Nuremberg Trials?
Yes, there was controversy surrounding the Nuremberg Trials, particularly regarding the legality of retroactively applying new laws to prosecute war crimes, the fairness of the trials, and the scope of punishment. Some critics argued that the trials were victor's justice and undermined the defendants' right to a fair trial.
Who is franz schlegelberger at the Nuremberg trials?
Franz Schlegelberger was a German jurist who served as the Reich Ministry of Justice under the Nazi regime. He was indicted at the Nuremberg Trials for crimes against humanity for his role in implementing Nazi laws, including the Nuremberg Laws. Schlegelberger claimed he was unaware of the extent of the atrocities committed by the Nazis and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.
What are Nuremberg trials during the holocaust?
they where certaint laws made up by the Nazis they where certaint laws made up by the Nazis No they are not, they are the convictions of the 21 leaders and happend in 1945 to 1949 Nuremberg laws were made by the Nazis not the trials
What was the popurse of the Nuremberg law?
The Nuremberg Laws were a set of antisemitic laws implemented in Nazi Germany in 1935. The purpose of these laws was to institutionalize discrimination against Jews, stripping them of their rights as citizens and segregating them from the rest of society.
What nation were the Nuremberg laws passed in?
The Nuremberg laws were passed in Germany.
Why were the Nuremberg Laws significant?
They were proclaimed in Nuremberg.
