The slaves mad them rich, and they also had made them feel powerful.
Keeping sharecroppers indebted ensures a cheap and reliable labor force, as indebted sharecroppers are less likely to leave or demand better working conditions. It also gives landowners control over the sharecroppers' output, allowing them to maintain economic and social power over them.
Everything. It was against the law to teach slaves. If someone wants to make people into slaves or keep them slaves they don't want them to be able to read or write. Educated people can't be made into slaves. An educated person can read ideas and write about those ideas and create conditions for revolt. They can think critically about all sorts of things. First thing Hitler did in Poland was to close schools and kill teachers. He want Poland to be a slave country for Germany. When the Jim Crow laws were made one of the things they included for voting was to read a passage of the constitution and tell what it meant. For people who had been slaves this was a way to keep them from voting. It will take another 100 years with the 65 voting rights act before they can vote.
a sharecropper is a laborer who wroks the land for the farmer who owns it, in exchange for a share of the value of the crop. the landowner was gaining more money than the sharecroppers. if you want this answer for mrs brand, here it is. good luck guys see u in school
Slave owners often did not want to mistreat their slaves because they depended on them for labor and economic profit. Additionally, mistreating slaves could lead to resistance, rebellion, or decreased productivity, which could threaten the stability of the plantation system. Some slave owners also believed in paternalistic ideologies that justified treating their slaves with some level of care and protection.
They wanted slaves to revolt and fight for their freedom.
The slaves made them feel rich, and powerful!
The slaves mad them rich, and they also had made them feel powerful.
The slaves mad them rich, and they also had made them feel powerful.
the slaves made them rich
To be slaves
Yes, the Confederates were fighting to keep their slaves.
Yes they did keep slaves if you want to check go to http:/www.unrv.com/culture /roman-slavery.php
Absolutly not. he did no want slaves the stupidest question ever.
Slave owners wanted to keep slaves from gathering or meeting with one another because the owners where afraid they would be teaching each other how to read or write.
They seceded from the Union because they did not want to lose the slaves that the plantation owners had. Thus, they seceded from the Union to keep them from losing their slaves.
they didnt care about them and they needed a place to keep the pharaohs after they had died
because they want to make more house