'Agreed' is just one word. Grammar only applies to words in a context. Please give the full context, then someone will be able to answer your question.
Say either "her and me" if in the objective case or "she and I" if in the nominative case; never "her and I" which shows inconsistency in case use.
irregardless is not grammatically correct it is a double negative- the correct term is regardless
It would not be a complete sentence but, there is nothing inherently grammatically incorrect in the phrase "during the all period". What you have is a reference to a period of time called "the all". Just because nobody knows what "The All" is doesn't make this grammatically incorrect.
The correct phrase is "in est" in Latin. "Est in" would be grammatically incorrect.
Absolutely. Why would you think it might be incorrect?
It is grammatically incorrect to say sister and sister. You just say sisters.
No. This is incorrect. We always say 'India has".
yes actually it is :)
Say either "her and me" if in the objective case or "she and I" if in the nominative case; never "her and I" which shows inconsistency in case use.
this question is grammatically incorrect, but i would say it is about 80lbs worth.
He agreed with You
It is incorrect. "That vehicle is not feasible for your situation?" this is the correct way.
irregardless is not grammatically correct it is a double negative- the correct term is regardless
"Off you go" is not grammatically incorrect.
It would not be a complete sentence but, there is nothing inherently grammatically incorrect in the phrase "during the all period". What you have is a reference to a period of time called "the all". Just because nobody knows what "The All" is doesn't make this grammatically incorrect.
The correct phrase is "in est" in Latin. "Est in" would be grammatically incorrect.
Not incorrect grammatically, but whoever you say that to might think you're laying it on a bit thick.