To the best of my knowledge, no dog has been equipped with a machine gun. The only case I can think of involving weaponized dogs was by the Soviet Union during the Second World War. They trained the dogs the associate the underside of tanks with food. The idea was that anti-tank mines would be strapped to the dogs backs, and, believing there was food under the approaching German tanks, the dogs would run under them, setting off the mines and destroying the German tanks.
It failed miserably. For one, the dogs didn't necessarily differentiate between Soviet and German tanks, and, with the loudness of the tank motors, the dogs were more prone to panic and run away, often taking cover in the midst of the defending Soviet troops.
It is beecause of hot dogs and their meat
No. Machine guns will beat Gatling guns.
Machine guns.
Yes, machine guns are better than Gatling guns because they fire more bullets faster than Gatling guns. Gatling guns need to have bullets and have to be hand cranked at the same time but machine guns does not need to be hand cranked. Machine guns only need bullets.
Yes, machine guns were used in WW2.
Yes. There were machine guns in WW1. There were Gatlin Guns, a type of machine gun, in the Civil War.Yes
Machine guns didn't cause wars.
Some machine guns are and some are not. The answer would be yes and no.
One or more mounted machine guns is a "nest."
Yes, machine guns are much faster than Gatling guns. Gatling guns must be hand cranked and fed bullets at the same but machine guns does not have to be hand cranked. All they needs are bullets. Machine guns also fire more bullets faster than Gatling guns.
yes they are. machine guns are fed bullets. Gatling guns are hand cranked and have to be fed bullets at the same time. machine guns also spray bullets faster than Gatling guns.
Yes, machine guns can rip off bodies. Turrets(machine guns) can shred the threat out of a human body.