Not necessarily as their functions are different. Leaders roles include primarily to determine the "WHAT" to do, while managers roles include primarily the "HOW" to do it. Think of a manager as the person that climb to the top of a tree directing the crew down below which tree(s) to cut. Think of the leader as the person with the vision of what to build.
If that was the case then there would be a lot more women managers than men, but it is not the case.
Managers are leaders - Pastence (appointed by themselves) Leaders are not managers - presentence (appointed by others) This is absolutely true, anyone can be a manager but it takes a certain type of individual to be a leader. A great quote I read once states "leaders plan the journey and sell the tickets, managers drive the bus to the destination". In other words, managers carry out work FOR someone else whereas leaders will be creative, have a vision and bring others along with their vision. I have written a couple of articles on leadership versus management and they are listed below this answer.
Years ago, managers were thought of as people who were the boss. While that might still be true in the early twenty-first century, many managers view themselves as leaders rather than as people who tell subordinates what to do
Yes, managers and non-managers should be appraised from the top and the bottom. This will help executive managers get a better idea of how they are performing.
There is a tendency to believe that managers and leaders are "born" with the temperament to lead and succeed, but conversely the only way to become proficient is through experience.
of course not
If that was the case then there would be a lot more women managers than men, but it is not the case.
No
good
trade all the managers if you have then in double because managers are better than hundred clubs
well, the modern economies and businesses needs, is forcing all managers to act as leaders as well, though its nto neccessary for evry leader to manage any thing. but a person who is managing is supoposted to lead the team he is managing, create oppurtunity, discover potential, add vlaues, illustrate how can an improvement for some process to reflect on the bunisness? but leader are nto supposted to manage things, they have to leade and inspire the wider team, including managers. hope this answesrs your question Omar
Managers are leaders - Pastence (appointed by themselves) Leaders are not managers - presentence (appointed by others) This is absolutely true, anyone can be a manager but it takes a certain type of individual to be a leader. A great quote I read once states "leaders plan the journey and sell the tickets, managers drive the bus to the destination". In other words, managers carry out work FOR someone else whereas leaders will be creative, have a vision and bring others along with their vision. I have written a couple of articles on leadership versus management and they are listed below this answer.
Most of the Mongol leaders did a better job on taking over land and resources than forming an effective government.
That depends on what role you are more comfortable with.
No
Years ago, managers were thought of as people who were the boss. While that might still be true in the early twenty-first century, many managers view themselves as leaders rather than as people who tell subordinates what to do
You said it in your question. They are more advanced which means they have better access to technology and other information which allows managers to "get the edge", over third world countries.