0
Did the north or the south have better generals during the civil war?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
The South had some of the best officers who had quit the US Army, but these did not always make good Generals. They tended to be aggressive, unruly characters who feuded fiercely between themselves. John Bell Hood, for example, was a magnificent fighting leader, promoted too high for his talents, and he led his army to disaster.
The Lee-Jackson partnership was legendary (until Stonewall's death), but Grant did out-general Lee in the end.
Sherman had meanwhile discovered an entirely new kind of warfare in his March to the Sea, which shortened the war by months, at almost nil casualties.
Many of the Confederate Generals have since been bathed in the flatterng light of Lost Cause mythology (a quality that has sometimes been called 'Wrong but Wromantic'). But they did generate a more appealing legend than the Union leaders.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoYou cannot argue with a win, and the outcome of the war simply confirms that it was the Grant-Sherman team that proved superior.
The other side had the Lee-Jackson partnership, which was felt to be unbeatable, but after Stonewall was killed, neither Lee nor his army was ever the same again.
It seems that the typical Confederate General did not do well in high command, though he might be an inspiring fighter and leader. Joe Johnston was rated by many (including Grant and Sherman) to be the best General in the South. But his brilliant tactical retreat was thought to be not a very Confederate way of doing things, and he was sacked. Also there is no doubt that the Confederate Generals were more prone to feuding among themselves, which often inhibited the Southern war effort, especially as President Jefferson Davis was not good at controlling his Generals.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWiki User
∙ 10y agoAt the beginning of the US Civil War, it became clear that the "Southern tradition" of military leaders proved that the South had better army commanders.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Military advantages of the north and south during civil war?
The easiest anwser is that the North had technology, shear number of troops, and industry on their side. The South had much better generals, a more willingness to fight, and that the war was fought in their back yard
Who was in charge of the north and south during the civil war?
There were many different Generals in the Civil War, but Lincoln hired all of the generals for the North who was the Union and the South who was the Confederates was mostly general Robert E. Lee. Douglas was the president of the South since the south wanted to break away from the union.
Who were some Commanders for the north in the Civil War?
There were several commanders or generals for the North during the Civil War. Some of the top commanders included Ulysses S. Grant, George McClellan, Robert Anderson, and George Custer.
Who were the most important civil war generals?
The most important Civil War generals were General Ulysses S. Grant for the North and General Robert E. Lee for the South.
What was true of the north during the war years?
During the Civil War the North had better manufacturing abilities. The superior industries was one reason the North finally won the war.
During the civil war which side north or south is led from the beginning by smart able generals?
This is a matter of opinion, but the South probably had the better generals at the start of the Civil War.
Who were the famous generals during the civil war?
Lee for the South and Grant for the North were the most famous.
Who were the two famous generals from the north and the south during the civil war?
The South - Robert E. Lee / North - Ulysses S. Grant .
What were the generals name of the south during the civil war?
He was William Tecumseh Sherman.Answer:There were numerous generals in both the Northern and Southern armies during the American Civil War (See Link). As the North eventually carried the war to the South there could even be said to be Northern generals in the South at some periods.
Did the North or South have better resources during the US Civil War?
The North.
Who were the generals of the north in the civil war?
Grant and Sherman
Military advantages of the north and south during civil war?
The easiest anwser is that the North had technology, shear number of troops, and industry on their side. The South had much better generals, a more willingness to fight, and that the war was fought in their back yard
Why did the North fail to achieve a rapid victory over the South during the civil war?
Because the south had a lot of generals that had gone to school in other countries and the north did not have that
Who was in charge of the north and south during the civil war?
There were many different Generals in the Civil War, but Lincoln hired all of the generals for the North who was the Union and the South who was the Confederates was mostly general Robert E. Lee. Douglas was the president of the South since the south wanted to break away from the union.
Who were some Commanders for the north in the Civil War?
There were several commanders or generals for the North during the Civil War. Some of the top commanders included Ulysses S. Grant, George McClellan, Robert Anderson, and George Custer.
Who were the generals of the civil war?
The major and most prominent generals in the US Civil War can be narrowed down to two generals. For the South the prominent general was Robert E. Lee. For the North it would be US Grant.
Why was its better banking system advantage to the north during the civil war?
because the boats
