Conscientious objectors could be excused from civil war based on their deeply held moral or ethical beliefs against participating in violence or warfare. Many legal frameworks allow for alternative service or exemption from combat roles for individuals who can demonstrate their beliefs through documentation or testimony. This recognition of their rights aims to balance individual conscience with societal needs during times of conflict. In some cases, conscientious objectors may be assigned to non-combat roles that contribute to the war effort without compromising their principles.
Conscientious objectors, who refuse military service on the grounds of freedom of thought, conscience, or religion, often faced significant social and legal consequences. They could be subjected to imprisonment, fines, or forced labor, and frequently encountered societal stigma and discrimination. In some cases, their stance could lead to loss of employment or social ostracism. However, in certain countries, legal protections and alternative service options have been established to acknowledge their beliefs.
Yes, there were several exceptions to conscription, which varied by country and time period. Common exemptions included medical conditions, age limits, and educational deferments, where individuals enrolled in higher education could postpone service. Additionally, some countries allowed conscientious objectors to opt out of military service for religious or moral reasons, often requiring them to serve in alternative roles instead. Specific policies and exceptions depended on the legal framework established during the conscription period.
Become a man of the cloth, or a college professor. Those two professions are fairly traditional.
During World War I, some individuals were exempt from military service due to various reasons such as physical disabilities, age, or essential roles in industry and agriculture that were deemed critical for the war effort. Additionally, certain groups, including religious pacifists or conscientious objectors, could obtain exemptions based on their beliefs. In some countries, political connections or social status also played a role in securing exemptions for specific individuals.
He could be a seargent.
Conscientious objectors, who refuse military service on the grounds of freedom of thought, conscience, or religion, often faced significant social and legal consequences. They could be subjected to imprisonment, fines, or forced labor, and frequently encountered societal stigma and discrimination. In some cases, their stance could lead to loss of employment or social ostracism. However, in certain countries, legal protections and alternative service options have been established to acknowledge their beliefs.
Yes, we will not go to war or even assist war effort in any way. Many witnesses have been given sentences in prison due to being conscientious objectors. However, we believe that there was no footnote when God decided "Thou Shall not kill"
Borden did not allow conscientious objectors or recent Canadian immigrants from enemy countries to vote in the 1917 election due to concerns about national security and loyalty during World War I. He believed that those who opposed military service or had ties to enemy nations could pose a threat to the war effort and the integrity of the electoral process. This decision was part of a broader effort to ensure that the electorate was composed of individuals deemed loyal to Canada and its war objectives.
They were called conscientious objectors, if their refusal was on religious, ethical, or compassionate grounds. Many also called them traitors, particularly those objectors suspected of simply being too scared to fight for their country. Until the Vietnam war the US and Britain offered non-combatant alternatives to objectors; those refusing these options could well be jailed for the duration of the war and possibly beyond. The US - during the Vietnam war - decided objection to a specific war was illegal and many objectors were imprisoned or left the US to avoid being drafted into military service.
A court in which conscientious objectors had to explain why they shouldn't fight. similar to a court of law, but instead of a prosecution and defence, an army representative, usually in military uniform, would argue the case with the objector. each could call witnesses and each had the right to appeal if they lost their case.
Yes you can. These days no one is forced to fight, but in the days of WWI and WWII people could be conscientious objectors but if the need was too great they would be forced to fight anyway althought sometimes they would be put to work with a less violent job like cleaning or cooking for the troops.
Could only find conscience and conscientious - any more???
During the last draft, members of the Jehovah's Witnesses and other peaceful, non-violent religions were not drafted for combat necessarily, but did often get drafted. Sometimes to an alternative service like working in a government-owned hospital or prison hospital facility. The ones who were drafted into miltiary service were made clerks or medics as "conscientious objectors." They were not required to train with, carry, or use weapons. I served with a conscientious objector medic who was awarded the Silver Star for heroism in battle risking his own life many times to save others. He was a draftee.
With mental disabilities, yes. With physical disabilities, it depends. They certainly wouldn't have any trouble being excused if they wished to be, though I'm refering to the traditional "physical disabilities", not the ones that count nowadays for SSI. Obviously if the disability was such that they could not hear or see the evidence, they'd be excused.
There were two categories of COs. 1. Those that refused to serve period! (Because of their status). 2. Those that served in the chaplin (religious) or medical corps. Those in group #1 were considered cowards; because they COULD have done what group #2 did. But they relied too much on the "crutch" of CO status. That's why they were treated so badly...very few people like cowards (though there might some people that do).
if they refuse to go to war for moral or religious views, they could be imprisoned, they are called concientous objectors. If they believe in peace rather than war they are called pacifists.
Yes, there were several exceptions to conscription, which varied by country and time period. Common exemptions included medical conditions, age limits, and educational deferments, where individuals enrolled in higher education could postpone service. Additionally, some countries allowed conscientious objectors to opt out of military service for religious or moral reasons, often requiring them to serve in alternative roles instead. Specific policies and exceptions depended on the legal framework established during the conscription period.