"Moral diplomacy" promoted human rights, independence, and equal opportunity.
During the Vietnam War, America was split in half (not literally of course). One side was called the Hawks and they were the side that wanted to increase military force and send more troops into Vietnam to win the war. The Doves on the otherhand, wanted the opposite and wanted the troops to be withdrawn and settle the war with peace.
its differ bc world war 1 was more important
The Eastern Front of World War I saw more mobile warfare, with larger troop movements and more open terrain, allowing for significant advances and retreats, as exemplified by battles like Tannenberg. In contrast, the Western Front was characterized by trench warfare, resulting in a stalemate with extensive networks of trenches and heavy artillery, leading to brutal, prolonged battles like the Somme and Verdun. This difference in terrain and military strategy led to distinct experiences for soldiers and varying consequences for the war's progression.
The Cold War was not "cold" per say, but was simply the name of a war that took place.
India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.
Answer this question… India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.
India split up because of religious conflicts, but Vietnam split up because of political differences. (APEX)---> India and Vietnam were split up into multiple countries.
India experienced conflict as a result of core religious differences, while Vietnam fought over political differences.
India experienced conflict as a result of core religious differences, while Vietnam fought over political differences - APEX
India split up because of religious conflicts, but Vietnam split up because of political differences. (APEX)---> India and Vietnam were split up into multiple countries.
Some French colonies had strong independence movements.
India split up because of religious conflicts, but Vietnam split up because of political differences. (APEX)---> India and Vietnam were split up into multiple countries.
apan retained its complete independence, while Vietnam and Korea were subjected to varying degrees of Chinese imperialism.
How did the independence of Brazil differ from that of Mexico
India split up because of religious conflicts, but Vietnam split up because of political differences
Answer this question… India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.