Feudalism of knights in medieval Europe and samurai in Japan was a hierarchical social system where land was exchanged for loyalty and military service. Knights served lords in exchange for land (fiefs) and protection, while samurai pledged allegiance to daimyos, local warlords, receiving land and status in return. Both systems emphasized loyalty, honor, and martial prowess, with knights adhering to chivalric codes and samurai following bushido principles. Despite their cultural differences, both systems were characterized by a decentralized political structure and a focus on warrior aristocracy.
righteousness honor loyalty power
In Japan women were equal to men, thus a women could become a samurai. In Europe Women weren't treated equal to men, thus they couldn't become knights. Samurai soldiers slept with their swords because they were scared of their wives, European soldiers didn't.
Knights existed primarily in medieval Europe from the 9th to the 15th centuries, playing a significant role in feudal society and warfare. Samurai were prominent in Japan from the late 12th century until the 19th century, serving as warrior nobility during the feudal period. Both groups were characterized by their codes of honor—chivalry for knights and bushido for samurai—reflecting their cultural values and martial traditions.
Knights and samurai were both elite warriors in their respective cultures, but they differed significantly in their social roles and codes of conduct. Knights, primarily from medieval Europe, adhered to chivalric codes emphasizing loyalty, bravery, and honor, often serving a feudal lord. In contrast, samurai from Japan followed the Bushido code, which stressed loyalty, honor, and discipline, often serving a daimyo. Additionally, while knights typically fought on horseback and wore heavy armor, samurai were known for their skill with the katana and often engaged in both mounted and foot combat.
Oh, dude, like, only knights in Europe were known for jousting tournaments and wearing those shiny armor suits, while Japanese samurai were all about their katanas and honor codes. So, yeah, knights were all about chivalry and stuff, while samurai were more into bushido and serving their lords. But hey, at the end of the day, they both rocked some pretty cool swords, am I right?
They served five year kids in the same way knights served baby's. (Feudalism, go figure!)
Knights and Samurai
Both Japanese and European feudalism featured a hierarchical structure where land was exchanged for military service and loyalty. In Japan, the system was centered around samurai and their lords (daimyos), while in Europe, it involved knights and nobles. A key difference was that Japanese feudalism was more centralized under the shogunate, whereas European feudalism was often fragmented with overlapping allegiances. Additionally, cultural and social roles differed, with the samurai adhering to a strict code of honor (bushido) compared to the chivalric code of European knights.
Feudalism is the structure of the government and part of the society. It is not a separate thing so in asking this question you are asking about a system that the knights were part of and created. Knights were nobles and a different class of people and were created because of feudalism.
The Samurai of the East have gone the way of the Knights of the West.
Three characteristics shared by knights and samurai were loyalty to their lords, adherence to a code of ethics (chivalry for knights, bushido for samurai), and the use of a variety of weapons and fighting techniques in battle.
samurai have an armor made out of bamboo, leather and some metal. but knights armor are made of steel or many chain mails joined together Samurai didnt have the chivalry that was requested from knights
titties
Virginia
Samurai
Samurai
Samurai, but actually knights were European Samurai.