Allied prisoners were often treated harshly due to a combination of wartime animosities, Propaganda, and the desire to extract information. Captor nations sometimes viewed them as enemy combatants rather than individuals, leading to inhumane conditions and treatment. Additionally, harsh treatment could be used as a means of intimidation to deter resistance or to punish captured soldiers for their nations' actions. The prevailing ideology and dehumanization during wartime also contributed to the brutal conditions many prisoners faced.
They were held as prisoners of war. What that entailed depended upon the "enemy" who caught them. In Britain we often made prisoners of war work, but on the whole we treated them fairly well. In Japan many prisoners were treated extremely badly and were frequently tortured.
It was not uncommon for rogue commanders to have prisoners executed. This was true for both sides of the conflict.
No.
They treated the US soldiers terribly.
In the civil war slaves were still slaves but still, they were with the enemy and were as such treated as the enemy.
Lots of people say very harshly so they treated them very harshly
Harshly
depends. if they broke the rules, they were treated harshly, but other than that, they were treated fine.
why did the spaniards treat the Aztecs harshly
they were treated harshly
because they were treated harshly, overworked, and were in bad physical condition. they were treated like property and were harshly beaten and discriminated.
they wew treated harshly because people saw them as a threat to socioty
they where treated harshly
no becuse he treated her harshly
the social context
That is your own opinion people could make an argument either way.
he treated john more harshly than he treated the other children