Yes, the verb "made" can be used in a sentence with an indirect object. For example, in the sentence "She made him a cake," "him" is the indirect object receiving the cake, while "a cake" is the direct object. This structure illustrates how "made" can convey the action of creating something for someone else.
A direct or indirect object is a part of a sentence. A single word in isolation is neither a direct or indirect object. However, most nouns can be used in a sentence as either a direct or indirect object.
Went.
No, "what" is not an indirect object in this sentence. In this sentence, "what" is a pronoun used as the object of the verb "having." It's asking about the thing being consumed for dinner.
The object pronouns are used as the direct or indirect object of a verb, and the object of a preposition.The objective pronouns are me, us, him, her, them, and whom.The pronouns you and it can be used as the subject or an object in a sentence.Examples:Today is Jim's birthday. I made him some cookies. (indirect object of the verb 'made')To whom should I give my completed application? (object of the preposition 'to')Jane, you are a good friend. (subject of the sentence)Thank you for helping me out. (direct objects of the verbs 'thank' and 'helping')
Any noun can function as an indirect object. A noun is used as the subject of a sentence or a clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition. Example sentence for the noun 'president' as indirect object: The minister brought the president some bad news. (the direct object is 'news', the indirect object is 'president')
The noun 'story' can be used for any function of a noun, the subject of a sentence, the direct object or indirect object of a verb, and the object of a preposition. Examples: Subject: The story was a good one. Direct object: Grandma told a story of her childhood. Indirect object: What is the name of the story? (object of the preposition 'of')
An indirect shows when something was done to something or someone.For example: He gave the book to me.The book is the direct object, me is the indirect object.
It's unusual for a number to be used as an indirect object, but it can be done. For example, "Give the three of them the answer to question #7." In that sentence, "three" is the indirect object.
Jim is a proper noun. As with any noun it can be a direct object, indirect object depending on how it is used in a sentence. Whether a noun is an indirect object does not depending on anything do do with the noun itself. The indirect object is indirectly affected by the action of the sentence. It is the subject of the sentence "Jim ate a hot dog." It is the direct object of "Sally kissed Jim." It is the indirect object of "Sally gave Jim a present."
It might be, but you can't tell without seeing how it is used in the sentence. Us is an object, but it can be either an indirect object or a direct object, depending on context. For example, in "Tell us a story", us is an indirect object. But in "They robbed us", us is a direct object.
"Us" is a pronoun, and can be both an "indirect object pronoun", and the object of a preposition, all at the same time. For example, it ("us") is the *indirect object* of the sentence: "He gave it to us". And it is also the *object* of the preposition "to". A preposition always has an object - it is the thing that the preposition acts on. "to me..." "me" is the object of the preposition "to". "from home..." "home" is the object of the preposition "from". "according to dad..." "Dad" is the object of the preposition "according to". But this concept of "object" of a preposition has nothing to do with the concepts of "direct object" or "indirect object" of a sentence. Consider this sentence: "He gave the tickets to us in order to please our mother." The sentence uses the preposition "to" twice: First, with the *indirect object* pronoun "us" as its prepositional *object* (...he gave the tickets to us...). The word "to" is also used again to introduce the *adverbial phrase* "...in order to please our mother". In this adverbial phrase, the phrase "...please our mother" is the *object* of the preposition "to" used in the adverbial phrase. The entire adverbial phrase modifies the verb "gave" - and, of course and more importantly, is neither a direct object or an indirect object of the sentence. It's an adverbial phrase. And its also the "object" of the preposition "to". As you can see, the concept of "object" of a preposition does not have anything to do directly with the concept of "direct object" or "indirect object" of a sentence.
On its own, puppies is simply a plural noun. Whether it is a subject, direct, or indirect object depends on how it is used in a given sentence. In this sentence "The puppies ran into the room," puppies is the subject. In "Joe played with the puppies" it is a direct object. In "Sam gave the puppies treats" it is an indirect object.