Colonies spread the war across the globe, making it into a World War. They supplemented European armies in both manpower and supplies. The African front would not have existed without colonies and the fighting in the Middle Eastern front would have been much less widespread.
It didn't. Germany lost World War I.
World War 2 affected South Africa in a significant manner especially in terms of the politics of the country. This affected the neutral stand that Hertzog had advocated for in South Africa.
a race for territory and influence
They took the USA and the cookies from the cookie jar
Germany lost its colonies in Africa and Asia
World War 1 never had colonies, nor has any other war before or after it. It did however cost the nations who fought in it numerous colonies, most notably Germany, who lost large possessions in Africa and Asia.
Germany lost all its overseas colonies after World War I, and therefore had none after WWII. They were modern Namibia and Tanzania, both of which became British colonies (Namibia as a part of South Africa) until gaining independence after WWII.
Many things. World War one, World War two, the Scramble for Africa, the Decolonization of Africa, the Wind of Change, and many other things.
World War 1 became a world war when the Allies and the Central powers started to invaded colonies in the world especially in Africa
After World War one (1919).
In Africa after World War 1
Italy lost all of its empire colonies in World War II.
In Africa after World War 1
There seems to be confusion here. Germany lost of its overseas colonies during World War 1. It sounds as if you are thinking of Namibia, which was German South-West Africa from 1885-1914, when it was seized by South Africa.
ya its true
They have to pay for the damages of war and also they were balmed for starting the war. Their colonies in Africa were also taken away.