no, they are responsible for themselves at age 18 Depends on what state your in. Some is 18 for both boy and girl. Others its 18 or 21 for one or the other. You would have to check with the Dept. of Family Services, as far as financially. If they live under your roof and they do something illegal, you know how people are, they will come after you if their lawyer is hungry enough. If they drive your car, definately.
In almost every US state, the age of majority is 18. This means a person who reaches that age is an adult and is fully responsible for themselves. The parents are no longer liable for any of their actions. The states with an exception are Alabama and Nebraska which are age 19 and Mississippi which is age 21.
No. Once the child turns 18, in the eyes of the law they are no longer a child but a legal adult and therfore responsible for themselves. They can make all decisions for themselves and do not have to consult their parents before doing so. However, the parent is not held responsible for ANY of those decisions. On a side note- In Georgia (possibly a few other states) there are still laws on the books allowing a child to move out at 17. In fact there is no legal way for the parent to make the child do anything once they turn 17. BUT because the child is still 17 the parents are held responsible for everything the child does. I know. Stupid law. But there it is.
No. However, you are still very much morally responsible.
Parental responsibility ends at age 18 or upon graduation from high school, whichever comes last.
They currently are responsible for them until the age of majority.
Yes.
No, at age 19, the "child" is an adult responsible for his own actions. The parent has no legal authority to make the 19 year old do what the parent wishes, therefore the parent cannot be held liable for the child's actions.
18
As long as the child is under the age of 18, the parents can be held liable. In some cases the parents can be relieved of the responsibility if there are indications that they have been trying to get them help.
yes, we are financially responsible for our kids until they are 18, in most states, 2 states, I believe it is until they are 19. If they break it we pay for it.Financial responsibility falls on the parents until the kid turns 21 in NY
They protested the actions of their parents during the Nazi period and were struck down by the police and conservative government.
No.
The parents are not liable for the damage. Parents can only be liable for the actions of a child who is under the age of 18.
No, at age 19, the "child" is an adult responsible for his own actions. The parent has no legal authority to make the 19 year old do what the parent wishes, therefore the parent cannot be held liable for the child's actions.
In most States and Provinces, once a person is 18 they are legally responsible for civil damages arising from their actions, and the parents are no longer liable.
As a general rule, parents can be held liable for damages caused by the actions of their children, including copyright infringement.
The child is no longer a minor. As an adult, they are responsible for themselves.
The question is much too broad to be answered specifically. However - if you are still legally a minor, possibly, your parents might be be held liable for civil damages, but they would not be held responsible for your criminal activities. If you are considered to be legally an adult in your state, it is only YOU that would be responsible for your actions.
It's a general legal principle everywhere that parents are held liable for the actions of their minor children.
No only the custodial parent is '''Added:''' I believe the first answerer misunderstood the question. Legally, the parents/guardians ARE responsible for the actions of their un-emancipated minor '''until''' the actual court action emancipating them takes place.
yes, once you're 18, your parents aren't completely liable for your actions =)
YES!
Companies are always liable for the actions of their agents, unless the agent is acting outside his authority in a way that the company would not have been expected to notice.