No one can be unbiased. But we can all be aware of our biases. If a judge is aware of his biases, he can modify his behavior and force himself to think twice and take stock of his feelings and thought processes before making rulings. If a judge believes he cannot set aside his prejudices and rule impartially, he must recuse himself.
Judges normally go through a rigorous vetting process in order to ensure that only the best are picked. Even though judges are human and may make some errors, they are professional enough to handle all cases.
The producers put aside a $5000 fund for every case to pay every judgment. I've heard the litigants split the remaining money. But at the end of every episode, in small print, it tells you about the money and payout.
When Judge Judy decides there's no case from either party's claim/dispute, she will drop the case (occasionally with no prejudice) and no one--plaintiff and defendant--is paid.
By making your case to a judge.
The judge closed the case.
Judges normally go through a rigorous vetting process in order to ensure that only the best are picked. Even though judges are human and may make some errors, they are professional enough to handle all cases.
If a judge is biased in a court case, it can undermine the fairness and impartiality of the legal process, potentially leading to an unjust outcome. It is important for judges to remain neutral and unbiased to ensure that all parties receive a fair trial. If bias is suspected, parties can raise objections and seek remedies such as recusal or appeal.
I completely agree with the prvious answer, but lets try to be unbiased. John Deer is reliable...Case is not always. John Deere has been around for 172 years...Case has not. I really wonder who is the best?
The Uncertainty Principal
The judge vacated the date in the case.
You or your attorney will need to file a request for a change of venue. In most cases, there needs to be very expllicit reasons for a change of venue. The most common reasons for change of venue are that the judge is related to one of the litigants (you or your ex) or the jury has been over exposed to the story in the news. You will not normally have a jury case, so you will need to show that the judge is unable to hear and decide the case. This is difficult to do. In addition, you risk making the judge less than friendly to your cause or your side if your point is that he or she is incapable of being unbiased in this case. It is a slight slur to the judge when you clearly state that he or she can't do his job.
It depends completely on the judge's discretion. The worst case scenario is that you can be remanded to jail to serve the remainder of your sentence.
Yes, a judge can overrule another judge in a court case if they believe the previous judge made an error in their decision or ruling.
Yes, a judge can dismiss a civil case if there is not enough evidence or if the case does not have legal merit.
Precedent (an decision made by an earlier, often higher Court in a mostly or completely similar case) in most countries is a strong indicator for a judge how he should decide in a case brought before him.
The producers put aside a $5000 fund for every case to pay every judgment. I've heard the litigants split the remaining money. But at the end of every episode, in small print, it tells you about the money and payout.
He files a motion for an order to have the Judge recuse himself from the case.