0
The often-told story is that European Imperialism towards Africa was caused by a thirst to exploit Africa's riches. And that is lasted for centuries, while in truth it only lasted some 80 years, from around 1880 until 1960.
Strangely enough, in reality the cause was slavery. Notby the white people, who by then (around 1880/90) already had long abandoned it, but the slavery of Africans by Africans. It was the European missionaries who whipped up public support to convince their often very reluctant Governments to take action against African rulers who refused to abolish slavery in their lands.
The proclaimed 'riches' could already be had by setting up trading posts along Africa's coast and by informing the local rulers that the European traders were prepared to pay good money (well, sort of...) for whatever they had on offer. And that had already been happening since the early 16th century.
Truth be told, once the forced takeovers started - and by the way, the Europeans' first action indeed was abolishing slavery - Britain realized that by colonizing all of East Africa they could control and safeguard the passage to India and other Far East posessions. France (always keen on their national 'glory') realized that they could enhance this 'glory' by having a colonial Empire. And the same feelings of national prestige caused a few other countries to claim parts of Africa. And of course, instead of buying goods from local rulers the Europeans could now produce and export them through their own companies.
The form of imperialism was much the same in sub-Sahara Africa. There were very few European volunteers for a career in African government, if only because many of them died of tropical diseases within months of arrival. So the usual form was: a limited number of European administrators only in key Government posts; a local tribe was selected and trained that showed aptitude for western-style administration; and then all lower Government post were filled by local people under a usually white Director.
In North Africa, in countries like Morocco and Egypt, a well-organized form of local rule and administration was already in place. Here, colonization took place by leaving the local rulers and administrators on their posts, but making treaties with these countries in which a European country effectively took over the the control of the army, the finances and of foreign policy.
What else can I help you with?
Is imperialism a political system?
Imperialism is a nation or country trying to get more land or spread its beliefs
Was imperialism more negative or positive in India?
Imperialism was more negative in India because it destroyed India.
Who started the imperialism?
The British started the imperialism back in the 1880's.It started when the British had 25% of the empire.
Where did imperialism take place?
Imperialism has been around for a very long time. Imperialism by definition is basically a very big country taking over a smaller one and holding it under its rules and/or laws. For example the operation in 2003 in Iraq
What are the relationship between imperialism and expansionism?
Expansionism is the practice or policy in which a nation expands its territory. Imperialism encompasses expansionism, however implied in Imperialism is a further intent to establish political and economic control over the area.
How was 19th century imperialism different from older forms of imperialism?
Older forms of Imperialism were more concerned with establishing colonies in foreign territories.
What of the following accurately describes a difference between European imperialism after the Industrial Revolution and earlier forms of imperialism?
European imperialism after the Industrial Revolution was more widespread than earlier forms of imperialism.
What describes the difference between European imperialism after the industrial revolution and earlier forms of imperialism?
european Imperialism after the industrial revolution was more widespread than earlier forms of imperialism
What are four forms of imperialism?
# # # #
How did European imperialism following the industrializon revolution differ forms of imperialism?
It was less concerned with conquering and governing territories.
How was imperialism after the industrial revolution similar to imperialism in periods of history?
In both forms, powerful countries dominated weaker ones for economic gains.
Which of the following describes a difference between 19th century imperialism and forms of imperialism that had existed earlier in history?
19th-century imperialism was more focused on controlling a territory's economy than colonizing it.
What were the 4 forms of colonial control?
Colony, protectorate, sphere of influence, and economic imperialism.
In what ways was nineteenth-century imperialism distinct from previous forms of imperialism?
Nineteenth-century imperialism was distinct from previous forms in its scale, driven by industrialization and technological advancements. It involved European powers colonizing vast territories in Africa and Asia for resources and markets, often with a sense of racial superiority and a mission to civilize. This era also saw the rise of new justifications for imperialism, such as social Darwinism and the "White Man's Burden."
What imperialistic forms of control did the European government use to govern?
Sphere of Influence and Economic Imperialism
What imperialistic forms of control did the Europeans use to govern the lands?
Sphere of Influence and Economic Imperialism
What imperialistic forms of control did the European government use to govern these lands?
Sphere of Influence and Economic Imperialism
