answersLogoWhite

0

Europeans justified their conquest of Africa through a combination of economic, political, and ideological reasons. They argued that they were bringing "civilization" and "progress" to what they perceived as "backward" societies, often invoking a sense of racial superiority and the notion of the "white man's burden." Additionally, the quest for resources, land, and strategic advantage fueled imperial ambitions, with claims of spreading Christianity further legitimizing their actions. This often resulted in the exploitation and oppression of African peoples and cultures.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

4d ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What factors did the europeans used to justify their conquest of africa?

economics, intellectual thought, religion, and military


How did Europeans justify taking people from Africa and making them slaves?

it was a chance for the slaves to become catholics.


From the African view in 19th century europeans countries claimed that the conquest of Africa would bring what?

Loss of political independence.


What was one reason that europeans explored the darker shaded area?

Europeans explored the darker shaded area (Africa) to search for new trade routes, resources such as gold and ivory, and to spread Christianity. Additionally, Europeans were motivated by a desire for conquest and expansion of their own empires.


When did Umayyad conquest of North Africa happen?

Umayyad conquest of North Africa happened in 647.


Who was the Inca leader at the time of the conquest by the europeans?

Atahualpa


Who was the Inca leader at the time of he conquest by the Europeans?

Atawalpa


Was The Requerimiento used by Spanish explorers to justify their conquest of the Native Americans?

yes


What is African Colonial historiography?

The writing of African History by non Africans especially the Europeans during the period of colonial domination is what is referred to as Colonial historiography. This was pioneered by explorers, Christian Missionaries, travelers, anthropologists and ethnographers. Most of the writings of these people were euro-centric, written in the European perspective and in most cases to justify European imposition of colonial rule. All kinds of devices were used to justify their claim over Africa including scientific explanations such as the Hamitic hypothesis. The euro-centric views emphasized European racial superiority to justify imperialist activities of Europeans in Africa. The African perspective was completely left out. In that respect the claim was made that history began only when men began to write. And since Africa had no written records before the advent of Europeans, Africa had no history before that time. And even during colonialism or its preceding years of trade, the history of Africa is equated with the activities of Europeans in Africa. This however has been debunked by African historians who have shown from both written (Arabic and Moslem sources) and oral sources that Africa indeed had a history before and during colonial period outside of their relation with Europeans.


How did Europeans get their information about Africa?

They explored Africa.


How did the spanish conquest the affect the Indians of the Americans?

Most accepted the Europeans .


How did the Spanish conquest affect the Indians of the Americans?

Most accepted the Europeans .