The term "Close Up" can be considered redundant when used in contexts where the meaning is already clear without it. In Photography or film, "close-up" specifically refers to a shot taken from a short distance, making the term necessary for clarity. However, in everyday conversation, simply saying "up close" might convey a similar idea without redundancy. Ultimately, whether it is redundant depends on the context in which it is used.
Extreme Close Up with--- - 2001 Extreme Close-Up With--- Drew Barrymore was released on: USA: April 2001
The duration of Close-Up - film - is 1.67 hours.
Close Up - 1979 was released on: USA: December 1979
No, Real life is not that boring and redundant.
1) The entire subject; usually referring to a person. 2) In a shot glass, 1 1/2 ounces of your favourite "poison". ;-)
Yes, it is redundant. However, everyone including university professors refuses to lose this redundancy!
Anything redundant is a back-up system.
redundant
Anything redundant is a back-up system.
it is passive redundant...
A and B are redundant. There is redundancy between A and B.Both "with" and "to" are awkward, if not incorrect.
Increased reliability
increased reliability
redundant.
Tagalog translation of REDUNDANT: paulit-ulit
It is OK to use close vicinity but the phrase is a little redundant and there are better ways to express proximity to. Use, "near, next to, adjacent to, in the vicinity of", etc. Set up your phrase like this: In the vicinity of the shopping mall, close to the entrance. I will meet you there. Better sentence structure and proper that way.
A redundant adjective has the same meaning of another adjective.Example : She was holding a tiny little baby mouse. Tiny or little are redundant.