Yes, and no. (Nothing in life is completely black or white.) We need first to define parental nudity.
Incidental, in-Context Parental Nudity with Boundaries taught
Most parents strive for a middle ground in their values concerning nudity and age-based guidelines concerning nudity. For example, typically parents are more lax about nudity between infancy to pre-school ages. By age 3-4, most kids begin to notice sex differences between themselves and parents, and between their parents. A little girl may notice her daddy urinates standing up; a little boy may suddenly notice his mother's breasts. When babies are breastfed beyond 2-years old, the breast may be more commonplace, almost seen as a cup to drink from, not a breast with any other purpose.
So by age 3-4, parents begin setting more boundaries. Besides moms seeking peace and quiet away from her kids "for a couple minutes", moms start closing (even locking) the bathroom door. The opposite sex parent especially concerning an opposite sex child begins to shower, bathe, dress, and use the toilet "in private". Kids also begin to understand that they can close the bathroom door (hopefully not lock it! Parents MUST keep a spare key for every door that can lock, and / or know how to unlock a locked door knob!) Kids as young as 3-4 are already in daycare where privacy becomes reinforced.
By K-school ages, the right and need for privacy is becoming the rule in children's daily living and moral development. Before 3rd grade and beyond, kids begin to object to parents helping them to bathe and dress, or said better, to object to parents seeing the child's nudity. This has more to do with independence than modesty, but modesty also plays a role in this stage of development.
By pre-teen years, kids object loudly to having their privacy invaded. If a parent happens to walk in on a child undressed, most kids will be quite vocal about it. Same with bathroom rights, even if the pre-teen is only preening in the mirror but fully dressed. This continues with parents through teenage years.
However, by accident, kids and parents DO happen to see each other nude or partly nude.
All of the above should fall into Incidental, in-Context Parental Nudity and Body Acceptance Without Shaming but also without flaunting nudity, both middle ground positions on the continuum.
Blatant, Deliberate Parental Nudity
However, some parents practice nudity before having children. They may (or may not) continue these practices once they have children. If they do practice nudity, most parents still strive for Body Acceptance. Nudists might set their own boundaries about what is acceptable or unacceptable--for example, closing/locking the bathroom door.
A second type of Blatant, Deliberate Parental Nudity is often abusive because other parenting skills are absent or lacking. These parents might shame, belittle, or make fun of genitals, size of genitals, etc. There may be inappropriate touching (molestation) or even sexual abuse. The parents may be inconsistent with their values, for example, violating their kids privacy but shaming and punishing a child who even accidentally violates a parent's inconsistent rules. For example, a parent who barges into the bathroom when their pre-teen is using the toilet, but punishing the pre-teen if he/she does the same thing, but otherwise, the parents walk around nude or semi-nude.
Accidental but Inappropriate Parental Nudity
Every kid and parent accidentally see each other nude, even when the home practices strict modesty. The most common accidental seeing of parental nudity is when kids walk in on their parents having sex. Parents deal with this by age-appropriate means, and setting limits and boundaries. For example: "When our bedroom door is closed, you must knock and wait."
Where accidental nudity can become inappropriate is when a parent uses that incident to encourage looking, touching, or to entice a child to look, touch, etc. This very often is a precursor to molestation or sexual abuse. It is far better for a child to learn modesty and boundaries---especially concerning their own bodies, but also concerning someone else's "person" as well. The better we teach kids boundaries, the better they can avoid becoming victims with persons in the extended family and with others.
Children need to learn about lines, privacy, and boundaries. Every family has this at a different level. It is not uncommon to do a quick change of clothes in front of a very young child, but as the child gets older, that sort of thing is normally phased out.
If an older child accidentally sees their parent nude, it is not the end of the world. They won't shrivel up and be scarred for life. At the same time, they need to know that is not the norm. In general, the majority parents would not walk around the house totally nude with children present.
In most households, if an older child was to forget to knock and walk in on a parent changing clothes, they would be expected to close the door and come back later, as that would be showing respect for another person's privacy.
Some households have much looser standards on this, but they would only involve casual nudity. Any sex acts in front of a child would be bad for them, and would usually also be illegal.
yes it should be removed
there certainly is a lot of sensual themes and implications in manga and anime. Even in such that are labeled as being okay for children. Like InuYasha for instance. it attracts A LOT of young kids, but its actually got a bit of bad language, blood and nudity. There's a lot of nudity and sensual themes in most manga and anime.
G-string +skimpy top.
The parental control feature is an efficient way to authorize access to internet browsing by your kids. It allows parents to block certain specific websites to be accessed by kids by blocking the access through settings page accessed.
no nudity
It is not "bad for kids". It is a horror movie that has some scary moments which some people believe children should not be allowed to see. However there were no scientific research to support their claim of "Children can't see this". Therefore, logically, it is not bad for kids, unless you consider watching a poorly made movie "bad for kids".
No, I read the back and it says "nudity" and sexual content" but theres nothing of this sotry! It's wierd! There are playboy magazines. They show nudity. Define "kids." I would not allow anyone under 14 to play it. If they aren't mature, then still no.
Nudity is neither good or bad. Within the right context, it is very healthy. There is a right time and a right place for everything, including nudity.
Not bad at all really.
It depends on how old they are and if you are their guardian. If you aren't their parental figure, then I would advise you not to let them watch it, but if you are, then it is completely up to you. They are your kids and for now, you are able to control them. --Ashlyn <3
there certainly is a lot of sensual themes and implications in manga and anime. Even in such that are labeled as being okay for children. Like InuYasha for instance. it attracts A LOT of young kids, but its actually got a bit of bad language, blood and nudity. There's a lot of nudity and sensual themes in most manga and anime.
G-string +skimpy top.
There is nothing wrong with any kind of nudity.
No. Profanity, violence, nudity and drug use.
It is rated mature, but there's no swearing or nudity or anything bad like that, just killing aliens, blood, the usual first person shooter violence.
The Superhero Movie was released in the year 2008 and is rated PG-13. It is suitable for kids age 13 and over with parental guidance. It is not recommended for children under age 13.
No. It's a Rare game :).
Lack of parental discipline.