The historical developments of both traditional and modern ethics and the connection between the two developments?

Answer 1

ANSWER:more accurately represent and understand what had already been explored. I feel and believe that finding the answer to this question would be; according to Moore and Bruder, "Ethnic is the philosophical study of moral judgments. But many moral judgments are at the same time political judgments." (2005). Moral judgment is defined as, according to Moore and Bruder, "…a judgment that states or implies that something is good or bad, right or wrong…" The historical development of traditional ethics was within the development of the Constitution of America. In this document, moral judgment was valued for all whom lived in the United States of America. The historical development of modern ethnic was develop by emotivist. According to Moore and Bruder, "The emotivists maintained that moral judgments have no factual meaning whatsoever .Such judgments, according to the emotivists, are not even genuine propositions .In their view, the judgment "It is right to keep your promises" is neither true nor false: the utterance is not really a proposition at all." (2005). The connection between the two developments is that each ethics development had some type of morals judegement. They both implies what maybe be good, bad, right or wrong. They both have some philosophical belief as in a group and/or for a society. According to Moore and Bruder, "…the rejection of emotivism and the emerging idea that there are empirical criteria for moral evaluations-are important…"(2005). Reference: Moore, B. N. & Bruder, K. (2005). Philosophy: The power of ideas (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Chapters 8-10