No. Dred Scott sued for his freedom, and lost. He was eventually granted emancipation by Henry Taylor Blow on May 26, 1857.
See related link below for the whole story.
Dred Scott is famous for the start of the civil war between the union army of the north and the south.
The Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sanford did not decide if Dred Scott was a slave or not, but that slaves (and their descendants) could not be counted as US citizens and had no right to sue in court.
The right of a slave-owner to leave his slave to a legatee as property in his will.
Dred Scott claimed freedom on the basis of saying that he was illegally a slave when his owner moved him over to the northern-free states. However, in order to sue somebody, it is required that you be a U.S. citizen. Dred Scott was viewed as property, and the case was never acknowledged.
Dred Scott lived in missouri
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
Dred Scott
The slave's name was Dred Scott
Dred Scott was born into slavery in 1795.
dred scott
Dred Scott
No. He was a slave.
Dred Scott was a slave and he tried to get his freedom by going to court and talk it out but he failed
Dred Scott
dred Scott is African
dred scott
Dred Scott