There is a huge body of work on this question, but Aristotle gave one well known answer: "the poet's function is to describe, not the thing that has happened, but a kind of thing that might happen, i.e. what is possible as being probable or necessary. The distinction between historian and poet is not in the one writing prose and the other verse-you might put the work of Herodotus into verse, and it would still be a species of history; it consists really in this, that the one describes the thing that has been, and the other a kind of thing that might be. Hence poetry is something more philosophic and of graver import than history, since its statements are of the nature rather of universals, whereas those of history are singulars."
http://www.authorama.com/the-poetics-10.html
I'd recommend Hayden White's Metahistory for an argument that historical writing is structured on literary principles.
In an academic setting, the term "literature" means that a work is a classic one worthy of inclusion in the Canon or worthy of scholarly study. It is not necessary to capitalize the term.
The term "literature" can also be used to refer to reading material in general.
LITERATURE IN 1920The Great Gatsby
Puritan literature would be sermons, dairies, scripture, and history of Puritans. Explorer literature would be historical literature, diaries and maps.
Novels were unique in trying to imitate real life. Mimetic means recreating real life. So literature in the 1800s were focused on realism.
the output of P controller depends only on the present state of the input, whereas the output of I controller depends on the whole history of the input. that is the fundamental difference between the control law of two controllers.
the relationship between african literature and carribbia
There are allot of difference but the main difference is the science is discovered while the literature is invented
Ronald E. Martin has written: 'The languages of difference' -- subject(s): American literature, Anthropology, Difference (Psychology) in literature, History, History and criticism, Literature and anthropology, Primitive societies in literature, Primitivism in literature, Race in literature 'The fiction of Joseph Hergesheimer'
th
One difference that I can see in both of these:-' The Hindi of literature is ' साहित्य' ,, ,, ,, Poetry is 'कविता'
Whats the difference between maths lit and pure maths
Literaure is short. Text is long.
clean your bathroom...
Literature is a sort of English/language study.e.g: ShakespearHistory is the past, about wars, revolutions e.t.c.e.g: World War II
The History - talks about a specific history History - is used in general
History requires to be objective and true,not permite fiction.Literature is the creation activity of spirit,showing the great imagination and creation of human.History is one part of literature,and literature is also an essential aspect of history.Usually,history provides literature with abundant materials.
I would say that literature came before history. Librarians put literature in the 800s and history in the 900s.
Prehistory refers to the time period before the invention of writing, while history covers events after the development of written records. Prehistory includes the study of early humans, their evolution, and ancient civilizations, while history focuses on recorded events, cultures, and societies. The main difference lies in the availability of written sources for documenting and studying these periods.