Violence is bad because nothing good comes out of it. People die and get hurt and bad crimes happen. Girls get raped and get forced to do stuff they do not want to.
Violence, by its nature, often leads to harm and suffering, perpetuating cycles of pain and revenge rather than resolving conflicts. While some may argue that violence can be justified in certain circumstances, such as self-defense or protecting the oppressed, these situations can quickly spiral out of control. Ultimately, advocating for non-violent solutions fosters understanding, dialogue, and long-term peace, emphasizing that true justice and resolution come from addressing the root causes of conflict rather than resorting to aggression.
Slavery can never be justified.
Curley's attitude can be seen as a reflection of his insecurities and the societal expectations of masculinity during the Great Depression. He often resorts to aggression to assert dominance and compensate for his feelings of inadequacy, particularly as the boss's son. While his behavior is understandable in the context of his character and the time period, it is not justified, as it leads to bullying and violence, impacting those around him negatively. Ultimately, his actions reveal a deeper vulnerability rather than true strength.
no
In the episode "Long in the Tooth" (Season 1, Episode 4) from the TV series "Justified", the role of Mindy was played by Michele Nordin.
It is an extremely subjective question to ask if violence can ever be justified and everyone has a different answer. The question has been argued about in philosophy for centuries.
indeed
Jonh Adams
John Adams
yes
some of the public thought that the violence they used was justified for their cause but some people thought that the violence was the wrong way to go to get what they wanted.
De Beauvoir argues that in some situations, violence may be inevitable as a response to oppressive structures that perpetuate inequality. She suggests that violence can be morally justified when used as a means to resist and challenge systems of oppression that deny individuals their freedom and agency. However, she does not condone violence that is used for purely destructive or oppressive purposes.
Yes Pierre trudeau was justified in using the war measures act. It was the only defence to cease the FLQs violence.
No, physical violence is not justified as a response to someone getting in your face. It is important to try to de-escalate the situation and seek help from authorities if necessary.
Yes, but only if peaceful methods are banned by the regime in power.
no one knows. i think it is because he had really good speeches so he knew what to say to get the violence he did/caused justified. He convinced the judges a lot with long motivational speeches.
Someone 'grabbing' you and 'taking' something from you, constitutes (a) an assault and (b) a robbery (in some jurisdictions classifed as: "Robbery By Force & Violence") - you ARE justified in resisting or defending yourself.