No.
No. That is copyright infringement.
In copyright infringement cases, it's best to start without involving a lawyer. Going directly to the infringer can yield exactly the results you wanted, and it's guaranteed to be cheaper. If direct action doesn't seem to work, then have a lawyer draft a more formal cease-and-desist. Very few copyright cases need to be handled in court.
No, unfortunately.
'p' inside a circle means 'protected by copyright law' and you are not allowed to reproduce it without permission from the author
This is a very contentious issue and depends on the country the music is stored in, the country it is being downloaded in, the relationship the site has with the copyright owners and whether or not a copyright even exists on the music. In many countries it is illegal to host and download copyrighted music to/from the internet without permission from the copyright owner. With permission, a site may be allowed to do so. Napster's original incarnation was shut down for making music downloadable for free without permission from the copyright owners. One way around copyright laws is by downloading music that has been released into the public domain under licenses such as the Creative Commons attribution-non commercial share-alike license which allows the music to be freely copied and manipulated so long as the original author is credited and that it is distributed under the same license.
That is a description of copyright infringement.
Without a license, yes.
Innocent infringement is a violation of copyright without willful intent. Accidentally moving an mp3 onto a shared drive would be innocent infringement.
Using a logo without permission would be trademarkinfringement.
The picture itself is protected by copyright; downloading it without permission would be copyright infringement.
Yes. Editing an existing image (no matter how much/little) does not void the original creators copyright and without permission is still considered infringement.
Copying, altering, distributing, or performing/displaying the file without permission from the copyright holder or an exemption in the law would be considered infringement.
Without permission, yes.
Altering, copying, distributing, or in certain cases displaying a work without permission of the copyright holder is an infringement of his or her copyright.
If it is recognizable as a copyright or trademark-protected character, you would need permission from the owner.
The reproduction or use of someone else's copyright material without permission or license.Copyright infringement is the unauthorized or prohibited use of works under copyright, infringing the copyright holder's exclusive rights, such as the right to reproduce or perform the copyrighted work, or to make derivative works.
Without permission, yes it would be an infringement of the artists right to control distribution of his/her music.