if all secondary consumers or predators will be killed.the population of herbivores will increase.there will be no living things.
If there were no herbivores our planet would be overgrown by plants.
I don't know why the you think I looked it up on here you dumb people. so have fun with my answer
they would just die
The number of primary consumer will increase and it will eat producers which utlimately leads to distruction of all live forms on the earth
If you mean are they the top predators, then No (as they can be scavengers).
why are there relatively few third-level consumers in an ecosystem?why are there fewer 3rd level consumers in an ecosystem?
Between producer and secondary consumers very little energy is lost to heat and waste. More energy is lost by keeping the organism alive than is lost to the environment.
your mom would know.... boom
The consumers would die of starvation.
If there were no secondary consumers, the populations of primary consumers would explode and the world would be overrun with rodents, rabbits, etc.
Consumers would starve very quickly.
Consumers would also die; they depend for producers for food
What would happen if grasses and shrubs were removed from an ecosystem? A.the primary consumers would increaseB.the primary consumers would become secondary consumersC.the primary consumers would die out or move elsewhereD.the primary consumers would stay unchanged
malulugi
There would be an overpopulation of insects
the eco-system would go out of balanced..
there would be no food for the consumers as a result there will be n life in the earth
Yes, consumers and the marketing environment are certainly mutually inclusive. Without the consumer, corporations would have nobody to market their products to.
The Fish WOULD NOT SURVIVE
They would die.