if all secondary consumers or predators will be killed.the population of herbivores will increase.there will be no living things.
The number of primary consumer will increase and it will eat producers which utlimately leads to distruction of all live forms on the earth
why are there relatively few third-level consumers in an ecosystem?why are there fewer 3rd level consumers in an ecosystem?
If you mean are they the top predators, then No (as they can be scavengers).
Between producer and secondary consumers very little energy is lost to heat and waste. More energy is lost by keeping the organism alive than is lost to the environment.
your mom would know.... boom
The consumers would die of starvation.
Consumers would starve very quickly.
Consumers would also die; they depend for producers for food
What would happen if grasses and shrubs were removed from an ecosystem? A.the primary consumers would increaseB.the primary consumers would become secondary consumersC.the primary consumers would die out or move elsewhereD.the primary consumers would stay unchanged
malulugi
the eco-system would go out of balanced..
there would be no food for the consumers as a result there will be n life in the earth
There would be an overpopulation of insects
then the consumers would probably eat less of what is produces and they would starve and have nothing else to do or no other choice but to die because what they consume is what they produce.
If there were no consumers, the producers would over populate and some of them would die off because there would be no room for them to grow. The earth's atmosphere would be different too, with much more oxygen than we have now since there would be no consumers to breathe it.
Yes, consumers and the marketing environment are certainly mutually inclusive. Without the consumer, corporations would have nobody to market their products to.
They would die.